Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Steve@OldSub.com: 662 ]

Total 662 documents matching your query.

241. [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:25:52 -0700
I got this email from a woman looking to buy her husband a truck for his birthday. Anyone know of a '55 1st for sale in California? I think a wife with that kind of idea should be encouraged! they're
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00515.html (9,359 bytes)

242. Re: [oletrucks] Modification idea (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:34:56 -0700
My father told me that way back in the 70's. I don't know if he was correct or not, but it seems reasonable. The way I remember the story I would not expect any parts interchange. The Rover V-8 for m
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00521.html (10,075 bytes)

243. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:52:07 -0700
If you have one you are ready to part with, send it over to me! She is probably interested in something up here in WA Steve, We can afford to export one more unit to CA. Lee Prosser -- Original Messa
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00524.html (11,089 bytes)

244. Re: [oletrucks] Modification idea (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:21:24 -0700
Saw a TV thing about that a while back. It was quite a project. Wouldn't surprise me. Russia (USSR) copied a B-29. THAT must have been a job!!! Bob K in PHX, AZ. -- Original Message -- From: "Steve H
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00528.html (11,151 bytes)

245. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:39:36 -0700
Great Idea! My last truck find was a Texas truck under an evergreen. Send up a few Arizona trucks, and I'll try to find them before they rust away! Maybe you can find a good "Arizona Truck" up in the
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00532.html (12,326 bytes)

246. Re: [oletrucks] 1968 C-10 rear end (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:46:04 -0700
I'm pretty sure either its not a '68 or its not 5-lug. Some '71s seem to be 5-lug, and all '72s are. But before that I'm pretty sure they were all six. If its a Chevy it is probably not set up for le
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00542.html (8,001 bytes)

247. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:57:18 -0700
After coffee (Seattle is home to Starbucks, Seattle's Best and Tully's) we are well known for micro brews. One of my truck building friends actually owns a brewery. But all that liquid sunshine can b
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00543.html (14,442 bytes)

248. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 19:43:01 -0700
Tully's is yet another big coffee brand. They were bought just a few months ago by Starbucks. Was it Navy and State of AZ? Or am I confusing you with someone else? We don't mind retired folk around h
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00549.html (16,863 bytes)

249. Re: [oletrucks] Anybody have any experience with Pickups (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:57:18 -0700
I've seen them at swap meets in this area (Seattle Metro, Snohomish isn't far away) and I think I've bought stuff from them, like arm rests and door handles, but have never ordered anything from them
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00572.html (8,547 bytes)

250. Re: [oletrucks] 1968 C-10 rear end (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:04:53 -0700
My '72 is 5-lug. I have a buddy with a '71 that is also 5-lug. Until I looked at that truck I thought '71s were 6-lug. My first thought was that the '71 might have been an early '72, but it has a '71
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00578.html (8,752 bytes)

251. Re: RE: Re: [oletrucks] radio question (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:44:53 -0700
Today most vehicles are negative ground. What that means is that the negative terminal of the battery is attached to the frame, motor and body, while the positive terminal is connected to the switch
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00583.html (11,606 bytes)

252. [oletrucks] Re: Dakota IFS (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:27:20 -0700
Welcome to the list! I'd investigate the rear from a Dakota. With the disk brakes you'll need to make adjustments to your braking system too, and the Dakota brake system would be matched pieces that
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00586.html (7,678 bytes)

253. Re: [oletrucks] 454? 1972 chevy truck (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:55:01 -0700
I don't recall when the 454 was first available. I feel like that's too early to be a 454, but I don't really know. I think you are asking if the transmission would be a turbo 350. If the truck is a
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00590.html (8,584 bytes)

254. Re: [oletrucks] Amphibious AD (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:46:03 -0700
So you are suggesting it might have flood damage now? Nice Try, Durwood. The amphibious AD WAS a Deluxe model!! (Photos clearly show corner windows). Until it was submerged, it probably was nearly ru
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00619.html (9,646 bytes)

255. Re: [oletrucks] 454? 72 Chevy truck (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:24:18 -0700
That's helpful info. I wasn't the one looking for it, but sure appreciate having it. I clearly remember seeing a '71 or '72 Chevy pickup with 427 tags on the fenders on a car lot back when that truck
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00644.html (7,903 bytes)

256. Re: [oletrucks] Questions, Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:59:23 -0700
I think the largest engine you can buy from Chevrolet is a 502, and I've seen one of those in an AD truck, so that would answer your first question. I just bought a 454 which I plan to put in my '55
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00647.html (8,278 bytes)

257. Re: [oletrucks] Questions, Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:34:50 -0700
I don't actually know. 600? 700? What does a big block ( 454) Chevy engine weigh? That is, with accessories? Thanks. Bob K question. window? oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00656.html (9,492 bytes)

258. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:07:19 -0700
I don't know much about those V-6's, but the reason I bought the 454 might be a valid reason for you to reconsider. I have a Buick 430, which was the predecessor of the 455. It cost me nothing and I
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00660.html (10,902 bytes)

259. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:15:33 -0700
Have you thought about buying a 270 and boring it out to 302? I'm sure I read somewhere that someone had done that, and I don't think 270's are that hard to come by. I know where one is near Portland
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00667.html (12,024 bytes)

260. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:11:32 -0700
Could be, but if ultimate performance is the goal you want a big V-8 anyway. That's a thought. But I understand the 302 head "breathes" a lot better. Bob -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Hanberg"
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00670.html (13,315 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu