Mail Archive Search: <+from:vandergraaft@aecl.ca>

Results:

References: [ +from:vandergraaft@aecl.ca: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Morgan Super Sports radiator heavy duty supports (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 05:17:19 -0400; I don't know about the rest of you, but the figures were stripped from this e-mail. Not that I have any answer to the question raised by "Bob Bowie up to Maine" but I think he should be aware that, a; /html/morgans/2003-08/msg00004.html (9,384 bytes)
2. RE: coolant recovery, Plus 4 (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:44:10 -0500; Colin writes, in part, "Unfortunately, the next day when I drove down to the painter's shop the ambient temp was downright Canadian! The engine never got up to operating temp (maybe my thermostat is; /html/morgans/2001-03/msg00022.html (7,453 bytes)
3. RE: Seat Belt Question (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 09:36:08 -0500; I'm not about to start a (futile) debate about the pros and cons of seat belts, but I'll tell you my experience. Back in the '60s, I was already a firm believer in seatbelts and insisted on installi; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00025.html (10,883 bytes)
4. RE: Seat Belts (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:23:11 -0500; Thanks for your response. No, I didn't blame the Corvair; it was a nice little car and my wife could drive it through snow up Pennsylvania hills where other "Detroit Iron" refused to go. If there's; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00030.html (9,674 bytes)
5. RE: Seat Belt Question (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:53:36 -0500; I guess my question was more one of relevance. The discussion had gravitated towards seatbelts in general, I thought. I agree with your being bothered by the efforts of the constabulary. However, ch; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00071.html (9,813 bytes)
6. RE: daylight lights / seat belts / cooling (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 23:31:09 -0500; If the bright light dazzles you, the driver in (on?) the oncoming vehicle probably has his (her) high beams on. I don't have any statistics on the impact of daytime running lights on safety. I prefe; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00091.html (7,820 bytes)
7. RE: daylight lights / seat belts / cooling (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:51:15 -0500; Add to that those nefarious fog lights! Chuck These damn SUV's are higher than cars, so even with low beams on, they are aimed right into your eyes. On top of that, most people who drive them insist; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00098.html (8,006 bytes)
8. RE: daylight lights / seat belts / cooling (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 08:51:53 -0500; Tony (in NJ), Interesting observation/suggestion. However, if they are dumb (i.e., speechless), they won't need a cell phone. ;-) If you look at the bright side (pun intended!), SUVs have only been a; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00100.html (8,747 bytes)
9. RE: daylight running lights (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:58:41 -0500; Didn't mean to imply that you don't know the difference between high and low beams. The issue, though, (if memory serves me well) was using headlights during the day. In Canada, new cars have to hav; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00132.html (11,300 bytes)
10. RE: daylight running lights saga (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 15:50:52 -0500; I thought so (based on the smiley). I note that you make your "smileys" the other way around as I normally see them: ;-) Is this because you guys drive on the left side of the road? Come to think of; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00133.html (7,618 bytes)
11. RE: SUVs (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:53:11 -0500; I can't speak for Tony, who will most likely reply as well. SUVs make a handy target so it's hard not to throw snowballs at them. ;-) Much, if not all, that I wrote about SUVs was written with tongu; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00136.html (8,098 bytes)
12. RE: Rats! (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:54:33 -0500; Now THAT'S class: baiting a trap with Swiss cheese! Emmenthaler? Chuck I have cats, but they leave footprints all over the bonnet. I once purchased these electronic gizmos that plug into 2-prong out; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00145.html (7,644 bytes)
13. RE: Canadian vision, chrome (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:21:37 -0500; One of the people in my group (a Mustang aficionado) has relatives in Thunder Bay and will let me know what's available in TB as far as rechroming services are. There are a number of these services; /html/morgans/2001-01/msg00155.html (6,802 bytes)
14. RE: Humboldt State (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:16:14 -0500; There is a "Humboldt State University" in California. Maybe the word "University" was written on the back of the t-shirt? ;-) Other than that, I have no idea. As to your claim as New Zealand being t; /html/morgans/2000-12/msg00060.html (8,479 bytes)
15. RE: Humboldt State (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:26:35 -0500; You didn't have to specify the scale: -40 F is the same as -40 C and we've only been down to -30 C so far this winter (actually, it happened in the "fall") Right now it's a balmy -15 C or just above; /html/morgans/2000-12/msg00065.html (10,014 bytes)
16. RE: Humboldt State (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:46:39 -0500; Craig & Kerry, Hope the beer and the firewood last longer than the storm! According to CNN, the approaching storm could really carry a lot of moisture. Up here, we've has snow since early November an; /html/morgans/2000-12/msg00066.html (9,015 bytes)
17. RE: Vern's Rant (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 20:02:58 -0500; Fred K. & Vern, Not sure I understand why you're sending this, what appears to be a private spat between you, to the entire list. Would it not be nice if we could just get along together? Or is it tr; /html/morgans/2000-12/msg00075.html (15,402 bytes)
18. RE: New Car (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:47:13 -0500; The BBC article mentions that the 300-litre tank is underneath the vehicle. A 300-L volume is not all that great, anyway. Take a car with a wheel base of 2550 mm and a tread of 1470 mm, so let's say; /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00008.html (10,033 bytes)
19. RE: New Car (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:08:23 -0500; I agree that "zero pollution" is nonsense but, then again, much of what we read and hear is nonsense. I saw a newspaper article the other day that mentioned running cars on water (because water is t; /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00010.html (10,276 bytes)
20. RE: Cryogenic Freezing (score: 1): Author: "Vandergraaf, Chuck" <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:48:47 -0500; This topic was discussed at great length by a Subaru SVX group on Yahoo about a year ago. (I was intrigued by the SVX, drove a used one and considered buying one until I heard too many sad tales abo; /html/morgans/2000-11/msg00015.html (7,713 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]