- 1. Re: land-speed-digest V1 #2399 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 18:05:35 -0800
- I think it's about safety. And that's GREAT! I don't think the board could go any other way. With traction control (in theory, at least) we reduce the amount of driver skill needed. But there are ple
- /html/land-speed/2006-12/msg00084.html (7,484 bytes)
- 2. Re: land-speed-digest V1 #2399 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 21:06:38 -0800
- Mayf--I share your concerns about the technical feasibility of TC on the Salt. Progress is not without some risk. In this situation I think it's manageable. The real control valve here is not the rul
- /html/land-speed/2006-12/msg00085.html (7,822 bytes)
- 3. Re: land-speed-digest V1 #2399 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:51:59 -0800
- MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL... I am not in the leasat troubled by allowing traction control. I am a firm believer that the best traction control is under your right foot! Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC
- /html/land-speed/2006-12/msg00087.html (6,671 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu