Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OT\s+\-\s+510\s+Appreciation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*OT\s+\-\s+510\s+Appreciation\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: Robert.Long@CSDInc.com; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:52:50 -0600; I went down to the SCCA RGR AutoX this weekend here in Albuquerque (as a spectator, my tranny is still at the shop). Datsun was represented by a 69 1600, a 240Z, and a 510. I've never really paid mu; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00131.html (7,564 bytes)
2. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Murphy" <solex67@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 12:15:40 PDT; I learned repsect for 510s on the All Datsun Palomar run. I chased a BRE 510 up Mt. Palomar and the guy's car was awesome through the corners. They have that independent suspension we just can't hang; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00133.html (8,583 bytes)
3. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: Sexmnypwr@aol.com; Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2000 17:01:11 EDT; After building 3 510's in the past, they are as much fun as Roadster's and 240Z's. The great thing about the 510 is it's lightweight, great handling and very predictable 4 wheel slide. I could drive; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00136.html (7,447 bytes)
4. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: "Stephen McCartney" <sgam@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 23:05:10 GMT; My first car was a Datsun 1600 (as they're referred to here) 510. Yes, it's a 1600 ohc - quite different from the roadster motors (L series?), and independant rear end. Those things handle really wel; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00225.html (8,923 bytes)
5. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: DemonTSi@aol.com; Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 19:26:28 EDT; kept Something like this? :) http://members.xoom.com/BADROC/temp/rearend_2.gif http://members.xoom.com/BADROC/temp/new_upright.gif http://members.xoom.com/BADROC/temp/control_arms.gif http://members.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00226.html (8,291 bytes)
6. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: "datsunmike" <datsunmike@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 20:04:47 -0400; I had heard that Col Joe installed an independent rear or was that the Harvey Bros. Anybody know the truth to this info? Mike -- Original Message -- From: <DemonTSi@aol.com> To: <sgam@hotmail.com>; <; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00236.html (9,032 bytes)
7. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: "Calvin Grandy" <cmgfam@sover.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:57:49 -0400; I made a half harted attempt at putting a 240Z rear end in a Roadster in the late 70's. This is a "Chapman" rear end in a very good execution. The hole assembly arrives as a "package", diff, lower ar; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00251.html (9,509 bytes)
8. Re: OT - 510 Appreciation (score: 1): Author: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 20:02:12 -0700; That wouldn't be legal for either of them. Hauser ran in SCCA Production and could have gone to a four-link with coilovers but not IRS. The Harveys run in SCCA Solo II Street Prepared and have to run; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-09/msg00276.html (7,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]