Mail Archive Search: <+from:jon

Results:

References: [ +from:jon_wissler@pngc.com: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

141. SU Carb Oil Question (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 08:40:08 -0800; Here is another classic neophyte (aka stupid) question concerning which oil to use in SU carbs. I have told to use 10W, 30W, and ATF from various sources. What does this learned list have to say on t; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-03/msg00626.html (6,956 bytes)
142. Re: NOWROC (score: 1): Author: jon_wissler@pngc.com; Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:26:30 -0800; MY GOD YES !!! I have reached the point where I was going to try and contact one of you, bribe you with money and/or alcohol, and spend a day going over tune up basics. I know next to nothing about h; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-03/msg00889.html (7,467 bytes)
143. Re: air shocks (only kinda related) (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 08:01:00 -0800; Information from the completely uninformed: I just redid the suspension on my 69 2000 last summer. A shop here in Portland (USA Performance), convinced me that the rear leafs on the roadster tend to; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00074.html (8,088 bytes)
144. RE: Roadster's British heritage (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:01:34 -0800; Regarding early Datsun's. I visited "The Ponderosa" last year, which except for one thing, was a waste of time and money. The main attraction, besides the tacky Bonanza set, are a lot of antique vehi; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00091.html (6,880 bytes)
145. 1600 vs 2000 body parts (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:38:15 -0800; I have searching for a replacement drivers side door shell for my 69 2000. I have either seen on the list, or been sent directly, offers of 1600 doors and/or body parts. What's the rule of thumb rega; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00200.html (6,703 bytes)
146. Re: FW: Bummed.... (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:50:34 -0800; What the hell, I don't even know anybody on the list but I'm moved to commit to a modest contribution.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00579.html (8,198 bytes)
147. Re: Starting A Roadster Restoration Project (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:29:13 -0800; Regarding Steve Landuyt's comments about the desirability of a 69 2000, I'd like to poll the list members (who seem to know a hell of a lot more about the subject than I do), about just which model i; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00732.html (8,765 bytes)
148. RE: Starting A Roadster Restoration Project/Favorite model (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:48:05 -0800; "The 67.5 2L is the definitive roadster in my opinion, but all are nice, especially the models with the flat dash. Mike '66" So what is it about the 67.5 2L that sets it apart? What's different on it; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-02/msg00737.html (6,882 bytes)
149. Passenger Side Door (score: 1): Author: "Jon Wissler" <Jon_Wissler@pngc.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:55:59 -0800; Howdy everyone. I just signed up to the list, and am a proud owner of a '69 2000 Roadster. It's in pretty impeccable condition, other than the normal nicks and scrapes of a vehicle with 70K miles on; /html/datsun-roadsters/2000-01/msg00122.html (6,972 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 149
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]