Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Single\s+ZS\s+to\s+Dual\s+SU\s+conversion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Single\s+ZS\s+to\s+Dual\s+SU\s+conversion\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Single ZS to Dual SU conversion (score: 1): Author: Dave Chu <davec@ECE.concordia.CA>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 1994 12:37:58 -0500; I plan to replace my single ZS to a dual SU on my 78 Spitfire this winter. I have the manifold and two SU from a 67 Spitfire. I was looking over all the parts and notice that the dual set up don't ha; /html/british-cars/1994-12/msg00469.html (7,504 bytes)
2. Re: Single ZS to Dual SU conversion (score: 1): Author: Greg Meboe <meboe@wsuaix.csc.wsu.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 10:06:18 -31802 (PST); Now I hate to be the one to break this to you, but you may not get the extra power you're looking for with this conversion. I am assuming that you plan to use HS-2's. What you should do, (listen to; /html/british-cars/1994-12/msg00538.html (8,120 bytes)
3. Re: Single ZS to Dual SU conversion (score: 1): Author: Randy Wilson <randy@taylor.infi.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 23:12:10 -0500 (EST); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You will have the SAME amount of carburettion, but a *lot* better manifold. The reason behind dual (or triple) S.U's, DCOE's, etc. isn't to get more carb, it's to g; /html/british-cars/1994-12/msg00547.html (11,449 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]