- 1. LBC Mods vs. Calif. Emmissions. (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Key <key@cs.utk.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 1994 11:36:53 -0500
- I'm considering a move to the left coast (Santa Cruz area) and am concerned about bringing my LBC into the state. It's a '73 TR-6 that I bought "restored" and then promptly had to rebuild the engine
- /html/british-cars/1994-01/msg00312.html (7,787 bytes)
- 2. Re: LBC Mods vs. Calif. Emmissions. (score: 1)
- Author: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 09:08:45 -0800
- Its always nice to have an SOL neighbor They will do a visual inspection to make sure all the SMOG stuff is there AND connected. During the re-build, my engine builder put I have not yet been able to
- /html/british-cars/1994-01/msg00313.html (8,874 bytes)
- 3. RE: LBC Mods vs. Calif. Emmissions. (score: 1)
- Author: "GERONIMO, SC9-32, 765-4903, PAGE 231-6612" <GENDIMEN@T12SYS.intel.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 11:02:29 PST
- I've got a California '73 GT6, it has no EGR, only the charcoal canister and PCV. I would think you'd need at least those items to pass visual and the stock carbs/manifold/air filters. I think heade
- /html/british-cars/1994-01/msg00315.html (8,596 bytes)
- 4. Re: LBC Mods vs. Calif. Emmissions. (score: 1)
- Author: sfisher@megatest.com (Scott Fisher)
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 94 13:33:58 PST
- Well, with a '73 you miss the $500 out-of-state registration fee that California enforces on post-75 cars not initially registered in CA. So the outlook isn't entirely black. Yes, then no to your tw
- /html/british-cars/1994-01/msg00318.html (9,602 bytes)
- 5. Re: LBC Mods vs. Calif. Emmissions. (score: 1)
- Author: "Sandro Menzel" <smenzel@mti.wa.com>
- Date: 18 Jan 1994 15:16:22 -0800
- You just _had_ to go and make me envious. :) While it hasn't been that wet up here (Seattle area), it's definitely not been very warm. Take care. Sandro Menzel | Network Administrator | '73 Jensen-H
- /html/british-cars/1994-01/msg00354.html (7,243 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu