- 1. VIN numbers (score: 1)
- Author: Mdsjcjensen@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 20:22:50 EDT
- I have number 1232 and according to the vin num it should be red. It is white and looks like it always was, even though it was repainted. any comments? /// /// bricklin@autox.team.net mailing list //
- /html/bricklin/2001-07/msg00017.html (6,172 bytes)
- 2. Vin numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "Ryan Rodgers" <bricklin_2568@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:11:30 -0600
- Ok, now bricklin #2568 is the color Black, But after the painting was already done, I looked at the Vin # Explained on the Bricklin web site and according to the site #2568 was red, but the real cars
- /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00076.html (6,921 bytes)
- 3. Re: Vin numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "John T. Blair" <jblair@exis.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:52:47 -0500
- Ryan, Not the web page is correct. The "RED" actually is sort of Orange, kind of a day glow red. The "ORANGE" is really more of a pumpkin (more brown). Just another one of the Bricklin quirks. John J
- /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00077.html (7,320 bytes)
- 4. Re: Vin numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "High Tech Coatings" <htc@MNSi.Net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:03:33 -0500
- If the car's colour looked orange to you, then everything was fine. Bricklin's "RED" was actually a reddish orange and his "orange" was actually amber. If the car was amber in colour then anything co
- /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00079.html (7,343 bytes)
- 5. Re: Vin numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "Ryan Rodgers" <bricklin_2568@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:33:19 -0600
- No, it was actually orange, I have pictures of it before it was painted, I'll try to get them scanned, I'm just gessing it was a facory error. Ryan #2568 Rodgers [This message delayed, as it was sent
- /html/bricklin/2001-02/msg00098.html (7,974 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu