- 1. RE: claiming (score: 1)
- Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:49:31 -0400
- Message text written by Lolita and Mike "On an entirely different subject I have a question about " claim racing " or so called "true stock" class , so here goes, (OK some of you may have to forgive
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00188.html (8,413 bytes)
- 2. Re: claiming (score: 1)
- Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@idsfa.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 13:55:00 -0700
- M.J. did say "non-stock parts", so you wouldn't be allowed to claim some guy's stock fueld injection system. I think the idea is to play by the stock class rules, but additionally stipulate that any
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00192.html (8,175 bytes)
- 3. RE: Claiming (score: 1)
- Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 12:06:13 -0400
- Here's my thoughts on the bottom line reason a claim rule is not an acceptable idea. When the claiming rule was in effect for SCCA road racing, a Richmond, CA, driver's car --a street-licensed well-p
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00239.html (7,529 bytes)
- 4. Re: claiming (score: 1)
- Author: "Boris Elpiner" <boris@elpiner.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:35:08 -0700
- I don't think that the claiming rule will help with classing and modification allowances, but it would be a perfect solution for our attendance problem. :-) Boris.
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00323.html (8,252 bytes)
- 5. Re: claiming (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:07:13 -0700
- Finally! A positive aspect to all this "claiming" nonsense! Scot '91 CS Miata -- You're three times more likely to wind up in court than in a hospital. Shouldn't you be protected? http://www.prepaidl
- /html/ba-autox/2001-07/msg00339.html (7,291 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu