Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Three\s+Runs\s+in\s+the\s+Bay\s+Area\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Three\s+Runs\s+in\s+the\s+Bay\s+Area\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:47:33 -0700; I really enjoyed the course Saturday, though I thought it was pretty tight in a couple of sections. It also had a lot of really challenging elements, something we don't see that often, so over all, I; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00315.html (8,207 bytes)
2. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Dietrich Schultz <dietrich@zync.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 10:56:26 -0700; I loved the course. For some reason, it didn't feel tight to me which surprised me 'cause I was expecting it to be slower. I thought it flowed really well and the walled slalom on the back was a kick; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00323.html (8,111 bytes)
3. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: David Rowney <daver@uclink4.berkeley.edu>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 11:14:06 -0700; That seems unreasonably late to me. My codriver could not run in our group (3) because of a late afternoon appointment. Certainly the first group, and maybe the second, should get 4 runs in the summe; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00325.html (8,841 bytes)
4. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Bergsman <jeremybb@leland.Stanford.EDU>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:31:23 -0700; I didn't want to bring it up since it seemed likely to inflame things but since you did.... I was angry when I heard the announcement, but after cooling off I accepted it as the right decision. I'm s; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00328.html (10,052 bytes)
5. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT); Suggestion: After the first 175 entrants register, only SCCA members allowed. After 250 entries or 12 noon, registration closes. Simple and equitable, finesse the number over time so we know what we; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00329.html (10,463 bytes)
6. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Jeremy Bergsman <jeremybb@leland.Stanford.EDU>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:53:52 -0700; I would suggest considering a slight modification: 125 (or whatever) entrants for the morning 4 groups and 125 for the afternoon. Otherwise this makes people running in the PM get there early and ki; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00331.html (8,704 bytes)
7. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:50:38 -0700; Could be even simpler than that -- just - start out with 75 marked SCCA Member cards, and 175 unmarked cards. - Unmarked cards can be used by SCCA members or others, - only SCCA members can use SCCA; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00332.html (12,300 bytes)
8. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:22:38 -0700 (PDT); I agree in principle with the suggestions you and Jerry made. I could come up with all kinds of load-balancing heuristics. But experience has shown me that any new-fangled scheme has to be so, so, so; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00334.html (9,461 bytes)
9. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Greg Umbay <greg_umbay@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:24:16 -0700 (PDT); --0-1804289383-959034256=:14844 I would like to add 3 comments. Limiting number of entrants sounds good. If this goes forward, can there be some kind of reservation for the 10 or so who volunteer to; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00335.html (11,395 bytes)
10. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 17:42:38 -0700; Runs are absolutely the problem. We should be running three runs at all events and fun runs when time permits. It is sort of amazing that three years later we still are talking about this issue when; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00347.html (8,749 bytes)
11. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:27:53 -0700 (PDT); Rex: I hear that the local Golf club is going to cut the course down to 12 holes rather than 18, so they can accomodate more people :-) I'm not fundamentally against 3 runs - I would prefer 4 of cour; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00353.html (11,589 bytes)
12. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Rex Tener <rex_tener@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:14:08 -0700; I knew someone would take my argument to the logical extreme. As the number of entrants approaches infinity, the number of runs has to approach zero to fit in our limited run time. I think it can be; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00359.html (8,900 bytes)
13. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: "Steven J. Sherwood" <ssher@home.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:26:07 -0700; Not that my opinion counts...but I think the start time is of paramount importance to getting started right. Starting at 9:45 to 9:50am is what started everything. I, for one, also don't want to have; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00360.html (13,434 bytes)
14. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Craig Boyle <craig_boyle@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 19:32:48 -0700 (PDT); You don't happen to be in marketing, do you Rex? ;-) Craig Let's at least wait until I get 4 runs this Sunday. Craig __________________________________________________ Send instant messages & get ema; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00361.html (8,527 bytes)
15. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Nandaholz@aol.com; Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:30:34 EDT; I agree with everything that Craig stated. You have to limit the event at some point otherwise you are cheating the people already there. The best autox I've been to was my first one at the Petaluma; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00395.html (8,274 bytes)
16. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Nandaholz@aol.com; Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:36:09 EDT; <<Something to think about... -> SFR works hard at bringing new members. SFR would like to build more drivers who wish to compete at a national level. We could be shutting that door.>> Yes but it kee; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00397.html (7,985 bytes)
17. Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 15:17:55 -0700; Yeah, that's a good point. When the time came for the drivers' meeting, I was frazzelled from getting the course set up & the generator running, and did a lousy job on the meeting. If any of you ever; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00419.html (9,063 bytes)
18. RE: Three Runs in the Bay Area? (score: 1): Author: Kelly Alexander <kelly@NVidia.COM>; Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 17:21:21 -0700; I'm just lurking on this whole topic, but I think it would be interesting to try the two groups. I've actually stopped autox-ing for the most part just because the day is too long (period) regardles; /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00434.html (8,048 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]