| To: | Nandaholz@aol.com, greg_umbay@yahoo.com, ba-autox@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Three Runs in the Bay Area? |
| From: | Kelly Alexander <kelly@NVidia.COM> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 May 2000 17:21:21 -0700 |
> Yes but it keeps the doors open for the devoted group we
> already have. Maybe running dual events wouldn't be a bad
> plan, maybe its time to expand eh?
I'm just lurking on this whole topic, but I think it would be
interesting to try the two groups. I've actually stopped autox-ing for the
most part just because the day is too long (period) regardless of the number
of runs. When I started last year, it seemed like we got fun runs every
time, and lots of them.
---
Kelly
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 3 Runs vs 4 Runs: Whose vote really counts?, Jerry Mouton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: It's not all bad..., Corey Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Three Runs in the Bay Area?, Keith Hearn |
| Next by Thread: | Pylon for May 2000, John Kelly |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |