- 1. Sac. Divisional (score: 1)
- Author: "James Martin" <James_Martin@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:52:32 -0700
- THANKS Sacramento Chapter!! Great event. The food was fantastic!! You should pay twice as much so we can have that site twice as often... It was a good equalizer type course with nice slaloms and fas
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00368.html (6,735 bytes)
- 2. Re: Sac. Divisional (score: 1)
- Author: "Donald R McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 20:43:36 -0700
- I second Jim's comment, the event was superbly run. Yes it was, and even though the wine selection was ???, Chris Halton's Beer was great!! I agree and love the asphalt even though the cement would b
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00401.html (8,141 bytes)
- 3. RE: Sac. Divisional (score: 1)
- Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:22:06 -0700
- Don, you have absolutely nothing to bitch about. I HANDED you the "equalizer" tablet at Saturday's dinner, and you were sitting right next to Jim! Letting him switch glasses on you was completely un
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00406.html (8,517 bytes)
- 4. Sac. Divisional (score: 1)
- Author: "James Martin" <James_Martin@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:46:04 -0700
- Any chance we can have 4 runs at the Sac. Divisional? Attendance will probably be a little less this year since it is not a SFR points round so we should have time. Jim
- /html/ba-autox/2000-05/msg00154.html (6,409 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu