- 1. McKamey School was: what a great school (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 19:14:03 -0400
- Ken, Could you unknot your fingers long enough to retract that statement unless you are speaking on behalf of the McKamey/Evolution schools? This year the Steering Committee adopted a renewed intent
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00107.html (7,914 bytes)
- 2. Re: McKamey School was: what a great school (score: 1)
- Author: Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 23:15:29 -0700
- What am I suppose to retract? I didn't call anyone a name or slammed anyone. There's nothing to retract. Was I not suppose to say anything about this? Was this something that the Steering Committee
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00121.html (9,239 bytes)
- 3. Re: McKamey School was: what a great school (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 23:52:20 -0400
- I was asking you to retract your conclusion: I don't care who said what one or two years ago. The committee can turn on a dime for a good idea that doesn't require it's members to do all the work inv
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00124.html (8,577 bytes)
- 4. Re: McKamey School was: what a great school (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 10:57:37 -0700
- I'm not quite sure who pays for site rental for a McKamey School (probably the students)...but in the Bay Area, that ain't cheap. Probably 2-3 years ago, almost 0 sites were available, thus the negat
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00138.html (10,289 bytes)
- 5. Re: McKamey School was: what a great school (score: 1)
- Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 01:32:03 EDT
- << I don't remember if it was in 98 or 99, I think it was in 98 that a Steering Committee member told Jean that the SFR Solo II Steering Committee was not interested in hosting the McKamey school in
- /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00210.html (9,031 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu