Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*8\s+CONE\s+SLALOM\s+$WAS\:\s+THANKS$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*8\s+CONE\s+SLALOM\s+$WAS\:\s+THANKS$\s*$/: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:52:13 EDT; << The 8-cone slalom was a bit much! By about the fourth or fifth cone, I was getting a little nervous. I also watched a few people go through it with the back end of their cars swinging out wider an; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00496.html (7,966 bytes)
2. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:21:31 -0700; I liked the 8 cone slalom, but I wish they were closer together. I hit the rev limiter in 2nd after about 5 cones and had to ride it the rest of the way. I didn't think shifting into 3rd in the middl; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00501.html (8,694 bytes)
3. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:45:34 PDT; Then you should have gone to the Divisional. Three 8-cone slaloms on three successive courses is enough for me. I'm not saying I do them perfectly, but that was plenty of opportunity to improve! I do; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00502.html (9,177 bytes)
4. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "avillasol" <avillasol@primo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:54:21 +0000; You probably should have went to 3rd by the 4th cone! That's way too long to be on the rev limiter, IMHO. Arie --; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00503.html (8,226 bytes)
5. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:00:01 PDT; Comments - since the cones were evenly spaced, why'd it take so long to get up to speed on the slalom? Second, what's the problem with shifting in the slalom? If you need third, you need third. KeS (; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00504.html (9,870 bytes)
6. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "Jesse Wills" <jesse@wordex.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:39:23 -0700; I agree completely. Our typical "slalom" (3-5 cones) consists of acceleration past the first 1-2 cones, maybe one lifting/braking point in the middle and then acceleration from that point out. The di; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00505.html (9,050 bytes)
7. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "avillasol" <avillasol@primo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:35:49 +0000; Okay, I had to go check because I knew it was more than 3-5 cone slalom. Last year's Nationals South course included a 6 cone slalom. Check it out at: http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/99nationals/so; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00506.html (9,367 bytes)
8. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:56:11 -0700; i vote for a steady speed and very smooth steering inputs. it has seemed to me that upsetting the suspension with throttle/brake/ or lift just reduces the transitioning-speed and grip. also, drive VE; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00508.html (10,052 bytes)
9. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:32:07 -0700; I definitely vote for smooth steering inputs. I just wish I drove like I vote. Hmmm, Maybe not, since I tend to be a "middle of the road" voter. I guess I'm just "using all of the track" in the poll; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00510.html (10,141 bytes)
10. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:48:28 -0700; "close to cones" i have this terrible problem that my sidepipes blow down the cones when i drive too close... there is this misconception that i am hitting them! if i was hitting them surely i would; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00511.html (11,110 bytes)
11. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:15:46 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --80AF9AF73A8C330E942A965C Point the pipes to the ground...it works every time. :-) Also muffles the sound a little better. --Pat Kelly --80AF9AF73A8C330E; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00513.html (12,402 bytes)
12. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:47:35 -0700; what, and screw up my downforce? -james sound if i seemed; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00515.html (12,278 bytes)
13. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:42:01 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --E7B1A9EDA3125DAB5A490BF0 Point them upwards, then. Geez! --Pat K --E7B1A9EDA3125DAB5A490BF0 name="lollipop.vcf" Content-Description: Card for Pat Kelly; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00516.html (13,442 bytes)
14. RE: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <nkahangi@interwoven.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:08:46 -0700; It's like these stealth front wheels that I have. They don't trigger the finish line some time and I end up stopping the clock with my back wheels. That's why there is this misconception that I'm SLO; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00517.html (12,507 bytes)
15. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: bchafin@attglobal.net; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:16:07 -0700; I thought the divisional slalom was a hoot. On Saturday's runs the cones varied in spacing which added to the interest. I'd measured between the typical 22 paces and as much as 26. Unfortunately my s; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00518.html (10,607 bytes)
16. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:25:36 -0700; You have that problem too, huh? Seems like the nose of my car will only trigger the start lights, and the tail only triggers the stop lights. I can't tell you how many events I've lost because of thi; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00520.html (9,353 bytes)
17. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Fvw94svt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:20:57 EDT; For the NorPac Divisional, Casey Cronin had an eight cone slalom (cleverly disguised with two walls replacing two of the single slalom cones) which demanded the same kind of driver skill and control.; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00521.html (9,714 bytes)
18. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:26:52 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --74A33A1AF697C0606E1FB9D2 I don't mind...that's the one thing our car does very well. :-) --Pat Kelly --74A33A1AF697C0606E1FB9D2 name="lollipop.vcf" Cont; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00522.html (10,638 bytes)
19. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 15:46:16 -0400; Count me as somebody who enjoys slaloms, too. That's as a driver. As an administrator I still like slaloms but I detest "optional" slaloms. Too often course workers fall asleep and miss when somebody; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00535.html (9,906 bytes)
20. Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS) (score: 1): Author: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>; Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 13:09:32 -0700; That was me. When I started my first walk, I wasn't sure if it was a slalom or just a straight. It kinda looked like a slalom, but maybe not. I didn't see Ben, so I asked Kristi at registration. Then; /html/ba-autox/2000-06/msg00538.html (9,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]