ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS)

To: Jesse Wills <jesse@wordex.com>, ba-autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS)
From: "avillasol" <avillasol@primo.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:35:49 +0000
Okay, I had to go check because I knew it was more than 3-5 cone slalom.  
Last year's Nationals South course included a 6 cone slalom.  Check it out
at:

http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/99nationals/south99.jpg

-Arie
----------
>From: "Jesse Wills" <jesse@wordex.com>
>To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
>Cc: <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
>Subject: Re: 8 CONE SLALOM (WAS: THANKS)
>Date: Tue, Jun 27, 2000, 7:39 PM
>

> I agree completely.  Our typical "slalom" (3-5 cones) consists of
> acceleration past the first 1-2 cones, maybe one lifting/braking point in
> the middle and then acceleration from that point out.  The divisional (and
> from what y'all are saying, Round 9), presented a whole new exercise.
>
> I am curious what (successful) methods others use for long slaloms?  One
> fast G Stock driver at the divisional suggested trying one speed that was a
> bit slower than "max", run most of the slalom at that speed and then
> accelerate out of the slalom.  Sounded reasonable, but I only got to try it
> on my last Sunday run.  Up to that point I had been going "max" for a couple
> of cones and then adjusting (braking, lifting), then back to "max", etc.  A
> true downward spiral... : )
>
> Jesse
>
>
>> I do wish we had more "real" 4 and 5 cone slaloms (rather than ones where
>> you can ignore the first and last cones), but 8 is too much like a school
>> exercise.
>>
>> KeS
>
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>