- 1. Tow Vehicles Redux (score: 1)
- Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 10:26:51 -0500
- No sacred-cow tipping this time, I've got a real-world problem that requires a real-world solution. Here's the scoop: It has become apparent that if we're going to be doing all this ProSolo vagabond
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00008.html (8,497 bytes)
- 2. Re: Tow Vehicles Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 11:12:14 -0800
- I would suggest the full size pick. Get on with a cab and a half, Super Cab Ford would be my pick. Why. Power and tow stability first. With 3300 lbs of car and 2000 lbs of trailer you need a V-8 a 5.
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00009.html (11,071 bytes)
- 3. Re: Tow Vehicles Redux (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:31:20 -0500
- So stop begging and pleading, who cares what she thinks of the tow vehicle's appearance? You see, YOU get to drive the tow vehicle and SHE gets to drive the DSM Go get the panel truck... pZ -- Paul
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00010.html (7,396 bytes)
- 4. Re: Tow Vehicles Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Hoult" <stevehoult@home.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 21:44:37 -0600
- trailer 5.7 I agree with all of the above except for the Pickup part. I would suggest the Ford E-250 3/4 ton Van with the 5.7 liter engine and towing package. Enclosed in back to keep things secure
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00064.html (7,919 bytes)
- 5. Re: Tow Vehicles Redux (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 09:14:31 -0800
- The van would be by second choice as I listed. Dave said he did not want all the extra seat. And my personal prefernce is a pickup. But then I hunt and train dogs in the off season and Haul all kinds
- /html/autox/1999-02/msg00079.html (8,780 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu