Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Net\-\s+iquette\s+again\s+$Roll\s+Bars\s+set\s+me\s+off\s+on\s+this\.\.\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Net\-\s+iquette\s+again\s+$Roll\s+Bars\s+set\s+me\s+off\s+on\s+this\.\.\.$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Net- iquette again (Roll Bars set me off on this...) (score: 1): Author: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:11:17 -0700; There would be plenty of bandwidth for a little extra SPAM if people put half the energy we just spent on SPAM into SNIPPING original post from their replies. Short, to the point, OK? Kimball; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00488.html (7,018 bytes)
2. Re: Net- iquette again (Roll Bars set me off on this...) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Whitworth" <dave@wcsllc.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 15:25:07 -0500; Not to start another fight, but how much bandwidth do these text only messages take up, even with the original messages still attached? I think most people have abandoned their 300bps Hayes modems, a; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00489.html (7,849 bytes)
3. Re: Net- iquette again (Roll Bars set me off on this...) (score: 1): Author: pylon@pylon.cc; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:50:21 -0500; delete original posts.... only keep what your reply is pertinant too, and if you keep the whole thing, the whole message is probably a waste.. don't you old folks know this, dave??? http://www.pylon.; /html/autox/2000-10/msg00494.html (7,060 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]