Not to start another fight, but how much bandwidth do these text only
messages take up, even with the original messages still attached?
I think most people have abandoned their 300bps Hayes modems, and when I cam
back to the office this afternoon, they are installing huge fiber optic
cables all over. We could all type till our fingers fell off and not use
1/10th of the bandwidth on one of these things!
As a serious counterpoint, I like having the original attached in case I
deleted the original message and am trying to follow the thread.
Long, and not very on point-
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>
To: "'team.net'" <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 3:11 PM
Subject: Net- iquette again (Roll Bars set me off on this...)
> There would be plenty of bandwidth for a little extra SPAM if people put
half the energy we just spent on SPAM into SNIPPING original post from their
replies.
> Short, to the point, OK?
>
> Kimball
>
>
|