Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Farzaan\'s\s+Wastegate\s+$was\:\s+Why\s+Smaller\s+Pulley\?$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Farzaan\'s\s+Wastegate\s+$was\:\s+Why\s+Smaller\s+Pulley\?$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Farzaan's Wastegate (was: Why Smaller Pulley?) (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 10:18:29 -0400; First you get misunderstood and shout: <<<**I DON"T ADVOCATE THIS THING, OK?**>>> Then you slam me for taking poetic license: <<<But even if I DID think it was A Good Thing and do this to my car, it; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00010.html (6,705 bytes)
2. Farzaan's Wastegate (was: Why Smaller Pulley?) (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 09:31:22 -0400; Farzaan's post was that as the current rules allow any exhaust downstream of the turbo, one could legally build an exhaust system with separate pipes for the main turbine outlet and the wastegate out; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01724.html (9,747 bytes)
3. Re: Farzaan's Wastegate (was: Why Smaller Pulley?) (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 09:41:45 EDT; to all You might be naive enough to believe this is legal, but IMO it is a direct attempt to circumvent the intent of the SP rules and will be shot down in a protest. Of course it will be a moot poin; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01726.html (8,206 bytes)
4. Re: Farzaan's Wastegate (was: Why Smaller Pulley?) (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 11:06:26 -0400; attempt to circumvent the intent of the SP rules and will be > shot down in a protest. Notice the quotes around the word "legal" Mark. For the record, I had someone ask me what I thought of the idea; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01731.html (8,061 bytes)
5. Re: Farzaan's Wastegate (was: Why Smaller Pulley?) (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:37:50 -0700; It's obvioulsy *not* legal, as I pointed out in a recent and previous email, at least in Street Prepared. The relevant rule states both "no modifications to the wastegate" -- this is obviously a mod; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01748.html (8,312 bytes)
6. Re: Farzaan's Wastegate (was: Why Smaller Pulley?) (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:10:06 -0400; obviously a modification to the wastegate No, it's not - the Stock wastegate would be left intact and untouched. No, it's not - the Stock boost controls would be intact and untouched. Look at it thi; /html/autox/1999-04/msg01752.html (9,238 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]