I just drove mine on a trip to Canada. Put about a thousand miles on it. Phil Ethier /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listin
It is effective July 1. Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
== Perhaps I'm just dense. But what changed here other than sentence structure? also allow camber bolts in SP == Ahh, finally an across the board allowance. Good. == Hmm, alternate Tunnell BMW M3 sh
== That works too! Eric Linnhoff in KC '98 Dodge Neon STS #69 www.geocities.com/eric10mm/KnuckleDragger "In Paris they simply stared when I spoke to them in French; I never did succeed in making tho
Please submit clear, concise, enforceable wording that will speel out what you suggest (u/b yes, but no drivetrain). We've tried. You participate in the StreetTouring Yahoo group so you know how man
Heck, I agree with Eric.. it doesn't buy me anything now..being in STS and If you want to keep everything Stock, then you can't touch your struts either. =) And was REALLY a stock class, then you wou
Andy and other members of the SEB: I didn't previously submit this to the SEB, but it was included in the StreetTouring group discussion in response to a request from a STAC member. I believe it is a
-- Original Message -- in == My quick & dirty disallowance wording is something along the lines of: "Engines, transmissions, transaxles and/or rear ends are specifically excluded from U/B. Each car m
Nicely done Brian... I would agree that this works best, currently the SEB seems dead set on all or none, a position I can see, For the record, I like this option best. Heyward Wagner Team Underdog R
Excuse me for jumping into something that is not my fight but could someone explain to me why this is such a big issue? We have had update/backdate in SP for years without the world melting down, why
Of course, I'm on the opposite side of this fence - we have (based on the current rules) spent time, effort, and $$ on building a car to the letter of the rules. The all or nothing is, IHMO of course
I am disappointed in you. You knew this was on the table when you and I discussed it at last year's Nats before you built the car. Your answer to me was essentially "no worries, we'll just put all t
RE: [evolution-disc.] Please comment on the August FastrackSo what exactly *would* you be able to ud/bd with this wording that would be beneficial? The best argument I have heard *for* ud/bd is allow
I am disappointed as well that many perceive the sky as falling so the solution is to go to the bomb shelter. The contexts of past conversations were regarding driveline u/b not being allowed, either
== You and me both, brother. Since we know the SEB generally has not a clue as to anything Street Touring related. So, Kevin, if you were to word the rule to allow U/B'ing of everything but the driv
This wording *would* allow for wrecking yard replacements, provided that the replacement part is not lighter than the original part. It would also allow lower trim levels to upgrade to most higher t
RE: [evolution-disc.] Please comment on the August FastrackBut the main reason someone goes to a wrecking yard for replacement parts is engine, tranny and rear. Smaller parts are easily replaced econ
If you want to keep everything Stock, then you can't touch your struts either. =) And was REALLY a stock class, then you would also have to run with the same tires it came from the factory with.. (O
It's interesting to watch this conversation in the summer, for a change. If the club's going to make rules adjustments in mid summer, what will we all do during the traditional winter team.net arguin
No one is trying to screw anyone. If that was the desired intent, there are much easier ways to screw lots more people. The attempt of the proposal is to level the playing field so that a large vari