Mail Archive Search: <+from:tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:tr6nut@sbcglobal.net: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Potential new helmet rule would affect autocrossers (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:40:25 -0800; I believe that's a reference to an old Bell helmet ad (If you've got a ten dollar head... buy a ten dollar helmet); /html/autox/2004-11/msg00134.html (9,106 bytes)
2. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 10:15:56 -0700; The point of my post was that SCCA does not have an "entry-level" autocross class. Sure, tires/wheels, etc are all costs that experienced autocrossers chalk up as "part of the sport", but a newby can; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00016.html (9,525 bytes)
3. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:54:10 -0700; I might suggest that since humans get old and die, you always need to attract new members (to replace the ones "leaving") otherwise eventually the sport will die. Autocross/SoloII has experienced att; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00019.html (12,397 bytes)
4. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 17:41:05 -0700; Ok Eric, Things I've noticed: 1. It seems that some of the more "high visibility" events (like ProSolo are over-subscribed). 2. It seems that the Auto-X "regulars", for the most part, want no change; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00023.html (11,498 bytes)
5. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 18:32:34 -0700; You wrote "So where is the problem that requires your solution?" A couple of weeks ago there was a great deal of whining on this list that due to the ability to register on-line, many of the ProSolo; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00026.html (9,891 bytes)
6. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 21:29:36 -0700; If you folks are happy to go to a "National Championship" where any bozo can compete, then more power to you. I think it destroys some of the prestige of the event. Would the Olympics have the presti; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00034.html (10,304 bytes)
7. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 10:59:07 -0700; Just for the record, I did not say "win", I said compete. That means anybody can enter and take up run time and resources from someone who deserves to be there and is a contender. There was no intent; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00042.html (10,908 bytes)
8. RE: New Member Attraction (wasUD/BD Explained) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:15:20 -0700; ...Just following this thread, you seem to me to be putting up contradictory arguments. I'll paraphrase: 1) "Why isn't the National office doing more to open our sport up to newcomers." 2) "We should; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00080.html (8,631 bytes)
9. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:17:29 -0700; ....Lots of countries send athletes to the Olympics to compete. Only three go home with medals, but everyone can say that they participated.... I was thinking more in terms of the Olympic Trials that; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00081.html (9,453 bytes)
10. My National Championship Plan... (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:46:45 -0700; ...Speaking as one of the "bozos" -- your term, not mine -- yes, I'm perfectly happy with a National Championship event that basically takes on all comers. What that means, Hugh, is that without arbi; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00083.html (11,626 bytes)
11. RE: FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:53:35 -0700; Geez, take a chill. It was a joke. But for the record, I have run PCA events in a friend's 944. The PCA events out here (west coast) don't allow any cars but Porsches. Perhaps your area is different; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00085.html (9,578 bytes)
12. Rebuttal to Eric Salem's Tantrum (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 19:05:33 -0700; ...For the record, having checked with the PCA powers that be on the left coast none are aware of ANY Porsche-only events of an AutoX nature held in the last few years. They do tell me that like man; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00097.html (13,624 bytes)
13. RE: Rebuttal to Eric Salem's Tantrum (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 19:38:02 -0700; You made a lot of accusations. You said you had reliable sources. In the end you were just full of BS Like 2.2 has ever been enforced, without the entrant provoking somebody. My work is done here. /; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00099.html (7,736 bytes)
14. RE: Rebuttal to Eric Salem's Tantrum (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 20:06:03 -0700; I don't think you're a liar. I know you're a liar. Please, you expect people to believe that in the wee hours of the night, PCA "movers and shakers" gave you information that contradicts everything t; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00101.html (8,837 bytes)
15. RE: Rebuttal to Eric Salem's Tantrum (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 20:08:37 -0700; I've got nothing more to say to him. Anyone care to take this offline and deal with it yourselves? Chris www.solo2.org Prove It You made a lot of accusations. You said you had reliable sources. In th; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00102.html (8,567 bytes)
16. Apology (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:56:59 -0700; ...Yep, there's a lot of that going around these days, sad to say. Just recently someone made some claim that Tim Suddard and a batch of BMW folks promoting the new Mini had no business being at Nati; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00130.html (10,978 bytes)
17. PCA (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 20:07:31 -0700; Todd, Randy, Matt, et al; While I appreciate the great info on PCA events in your areas (San Diego, Los Angeles, New York, Northern New Jersey, etc), I don't think that it answers the question. The q; /html/autox/2003-07/msg00132.html (7,684 bytes)
18. RE: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:37:03 -0700; My point is that if SCCA was really serious about having an entry-level class, then Stock class would require real street tires and outlaw "unobtanium" shocks. While its true that ability counts as m; /html/autox/2003-06/msg00213.html (8,971 bytes)
19. FW: UD/BD Explained (was Fastrack) (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:39:09 -0700; Oh please!!. Stock class autocrossing has not been "where you will be reasonably able to compete in the car you were introduced to the sport in" for at least the past ten years. When I ran in stock c; /html/autox/2003-06/msg00214.html (9,656 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]