- 1. Re: Spell-checking account (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:51:49 -0700
- it. Sure you did, Josh. :) Richard Nichols CP Mustang SVO TII TeamSVO Autox
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00063.html (6,666 bytes)
- 2. Re: Honda help (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:06:35 -0700
- You're gonna get a lot of replies, that will just make it difficult to decide who's right Here's what I'd do (and I've been stranded *plenty*, like this morning when my gauge said I had gas, and I di
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00066.html (9,066 bytes)
- 3. Re: Electrical vs. Mechanical Gauges (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 06:20:55 -0700
- The big advantage to electric gauges is that you're not bringing the measured medium into the cockpit, or exposing it to leakage under the hood: hot oil, fuel, or manifold air. Take it from someone
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00637.html (9,709 bytes)
- 4. Re: Cooling Intercoolers on Grid (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:03:17 -0700
- It would help if you'd mention the class, next time, when asking rules questions, Paul! Make for shorter answers. :) In Street Prepared, 14.10.C specifically precludes this (it's new), as does 15.10.
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00798.html (8,552 bytes)
- 5. Re: Cooling Intercoolers on Grid (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:45:02 -0700
- CO2 idea I'm learning all the time, and both of these posters are certainly qualified to do the teaching. The notion that one's car could be in a condition that wouldn't meet the rules just moments b
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00850.html (10,646 bytes)
- 6. Re: Interesting question (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:23:22 -0700
- Bruce Haden replied: I started to reply just this way, too, Bruce -- then wondered, depending on the class he's running the car in (like Stock), if there couldn't be some limitation in the original
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg00908.html (7,677 bytes)
- 7. Re: How do you reduce oversteer in a FWD car? (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:47:02 -0700
- Another area I haven't seen addressed explicitly in this thread, is I have no experience at *racing* (can I use that word?) a FWD car, though I've driven 'em on the street for a long time. But is it
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01081.html (9,745 bytes)
- 8. Re: How do you reduce oversteer in a FWD car? (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:26:55 -0700
- Bet I could get the rear tires to break loose -- oversteer -- in my FWD Honda Accord, goin' through a corner. :) We don't have to spin the rear tires to get the rear end to break loose. I'm talking a
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01111.html (10,287 bytes)
- 9. Re: How do you reduce oversteer in a FWD car? (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 05:52:01 -0700
- the rear comes around, including a spin, let's agree it's called oversteer! start Don't get your underwear in a bunch. If you reread my post, you'll see that I wasn't giving out advice on the subjec
- /html/autox/1999-08/msg01148.html (9,026 bytes)
- 10. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 08:05:38 -0700
- At least this is an *interesting* thread. :] I wouldn't blame those who might say they'll *scream* next time they see the word "turbo" -- but speaking for myself, I *am* gonna scream every time I see
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00062.html (10,214 bytes)
- 11. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:16:50 -0700
- Wulll, gotta admit that what I know about how cars are hampered by emissions these days is limited. But my own turbocar, the SVO, was identically equipped for all 50 states (CA cars simply paid more
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00076.html (9,729 bytes)
- 12. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:22:02 -0700
- My own comments of late (including my post excerpted for this part of the thread) have avoided this fencing over which is more expensive. I even made the point that the tires/wheels that RRs run on
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00077.html (7,781 bytes)
- 13. Re: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:23:15 -0700
- guys -- So -- where *are* they? The RRs, that is. Richard Nichols rnichol1@san.rr.com 1986 Ford Mustang SVO / 1C VirtualTeamSVO Member 1972 Ford Pinto Sedan / 3J - Original Owner Displayed @ San Die
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00078.html (7,845 bytes)
- 14. Fw: SST vs. STU (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:28:26 -0700
- Strategically it makes sense to me to allow ST classes to have <SNIP> The jury will please disregard the witness's statements! :] Of course I meant it does NOT make sense to me that street touring c
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00079.html (7,515 bytes)
- 15. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:36:44 -0700
- Thanks, Aaron -- for adding your two cents. This is where I've been coming from, when I try to contribute to this thread, and I have been feeling like a salmon (swimming upstream). My perspective exa
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00105.html (10,169 bytes)
- 16. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 06:54:20 -0700
- street than I do at an autox. To set the record straight, though I agreed with this statement, I didn't make it. I cited it from another post to say "see, I'm not the only one"! Though I did receive
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00160.html (10,939 bytes)
- 17. Stock suspension SVO kicks b*** in "shootout" (long) (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:11:14 -0700
- Here's an edited (!) account of the recent "shootout" among several Mustangs, done for a magazine called "Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords". Included among the 6 Fords running was a turbocharged Mustang
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00564.html (12,133 bytes)
- 18. Re: STU Rules Update Update (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:11:06 -0700
- Bugged me, too -- but you mean "PORE-sha", doncha? ;) Which reminds me of a story I read in a car mag years ago. An editor coudn't understand why one of his readers/callers kept saying "pore-tee-ay"
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00658.html (8,878 bytes)
- 19. Re: Mustang web sites (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 07:49:59 -0700
- Really thought you would've had more responses than this by now, so here are A Mustang autox and roadrace listserve: rrax-mustang@egroups.com (The prefix means "roadrace/autocross"). I have lots more
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00744.html (8,582 bytes)
- 20. Re: mustang web sites (score: 1)
- Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 13:18:01 -0700
- I sent him to rrax also, and agree it is very good. IMHO, I found little, though, in the week I was on the CP list, that was relevant to Mustangs in particular or P in general. Just my 2 cents. Richa
- /html/autox/1999-07/msg00765.html (8,452 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu