Mail Archive Search: <+from:mikec@actional.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:mikec@actional.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: 04 Nats and Runoffs dates (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:12:56 -0800; At first it sounded backwards to me but it is correct. The reason for this is interesting. Since 365 mod 7 = 1, a normal year is 52 weeks and 1 day long. Thus the week shifts forward by one day each; /html/autox/2003-11/msg00165.html (8,087 bytes)
2. Panoz Roadster for sale (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:21:39 -0700; Hi everyone, Our family is going for a big lifestyle change and moving to a small island. Our new life will be incompatible with motorsports and with my Panoz Roadster in particular, so it is for sal; /html/autox/2003-10/msg00060.html (8,311 bytes)
3. re: Panoz Roadster for sale (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:49:53 -0700; I contacted Panoz & their network of sellers and they said the $50k and up offers you see on DuPont registry and such are not actually selling. Panoz Roadsters sell when they're priced in the $40k ra; /html/autox/2003-10/msg00089.html (7,183 bytes)
4. interesting cylinder head design (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:25:38 -0700; Anyone ever heard of this before? Looks really cool to me. http://www.coatesengine.com/eGallery/pages/RotaryValveSystem.htm As I understand the picture, there's a hole in the top of the combustion ch; /html/autox/2003-08/msg00142.html (8,583 bytes)
5. tire fit question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:52:36 -0700; Anybody know whether 315x30 tires will fit on an 18x10.5 rim? The tires on there right now are 295x35 and they fit just fine, but they do stick out just a little bit past the sides of the rim. These; /html/autox/2003-08/msg00192.html (7,221 bytes)
6. S2000 ring & pinion ratio question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:11:27 -0700; Trying again... /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00262.html (7,997 bytes)
7. RE: S2000 ring & pinion ratio question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:59:47 -0700; I didn't know it had a primary reduction (sort of like a motorcycle). But I don't think that affects the outcome. Problem is, the stock gearing still is way too tall: 80+ MPH in 2nd gear and hard to; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00274.html (8,967 bytes)
8. RE: S2000 ring & pinion ratio question (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clements" <mikec@actional.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:18:20 -0700; You're right. I didn't know about the 1.16 primary reduction which is A: my original calculations were 16% off B: I was looking for a ratio that was 16% taller (4.75) Looks like the 4.3 or 4.44 ratio; /html/autox/2003-04/msg00275.html (9,834 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]