Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchell@compuserve.com: 461 ]

Total 461 documents matching your query.

61. Tonto and the Lone Ranger (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:14:21 -0500
Tonto and the Lone Ranger had been captured by the Indians, and the Lone Ranger was going to be put to death. The chief decided to grant him three last wishes, however. The Lone Ranger said he wished
/html/autox/2001-06/msg00448.html (7,286 bytes)

62. Re: Street Modified cost (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 13:32:02 -0500
kind of power, could be an Here's another possibility in SM: a custom transmission with close ratio gears that can keep a peaky engine in its powerband from, say, 20 mph to 65 or so. Not much use on
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00070.html (8,486 bytes)

63. Re: Street Modified cost (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 22:11:16 -0500
Given that you've plugged your concept more than once on team.net, don't you think it would be a good idea get just a little more specific for those who might be curious? I've seen articles in which
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00119.html (7,951 bytes)

64. Re: Solo DSC: was "Street Modified cost" (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 07:15:25 -0500
Eric Linnhoff's crack notwithstanding, I am not now, nor have I ever been, opposed to new ideas. It appears, however, that I must apologize for my preference for ideas that actually make sense, as th
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00130.html (11,516 bytes)

65. Re: Solo DSC: was "Street Modified cost" (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 13:36:17 -0500
that works out cars at a (more likely, a Uhh, no. If you _start_ a car every 20 seconds, you complete a run approximately every 20 seconds, _regardless_ of course length. We've been through this befo
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00140.html (11,073 bytes)

66. Re: Solo DSC: was "Street Modified cost" (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 21:59:44 -0500
George Ryan wrote:<quad4fiero@webzone.net> Lots of times, it's because of poor course design. There's absolutely nothing in the present Solo II rules that prevents one from laying out an easily-follo
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00152.html (13,218 bytes)

67. Re: Solo DSC: was "Street Modified cost" (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 07:22:39 -0500
<snip story> That's not evidence of a problem with Solo II, it's evidence of SCCA's failure to market itself. If SCCA wants more visibility, what's to stop them from running 30 second spots on televi
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00159.html (9,777 bytes)

68. Re: Solo DSC (part one) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 08:13:15 -0500
Pretty close. We typically have very few - often zero - novice-related DNFs here in Texas Region. But we do have a Novice chairperson who walks the course with the newbies and gives them some pointer
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00163.html (11,505 bytes)

69. Re: Mr. Ryan & the SCCA (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 15:35:09 -0500
I'm gonna join the Street Rockers myself. Then we can have Mods vs. Rockers shootouts. ;<) Jay
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00177.html (7,334 bytes)

70. Re: Scales at Mid-Div (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 08:07:12 -0500
I'd suggest reading the Solo II rules, Section 6.9, Page 70. Scales _are_ required by the rules at Divisional events, and it is the responsibility of the host Region to provide them. Jay
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00219.html (8,029 bytes)

71. Re: Scales at Mid-Div (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:53:59 -0500
as often as you FWIW, I look at 'em every year to identify what's different from last year. The rule about scales has been in there as long as my rulebooks go back (1987). Every Divisional in which I
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00227.html (9,300 bytes)

72. Re: [kcautox] Re: Scales at Mid-Div (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:57:47 -0500
I stand corrected on a point of nomenclature. My apologies for assuming that a "Divisional" event was intended to be a "Divisional Championship" event. Silly me. Just for the record, does Mid-Div co
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00228.html (7,821 bytes)

73. Re: [kcautox] Re: Scales at Mid-Div (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:00:48 -0500
One further question: since this is not a "Divisional Championship" event, would it not also be true that competing in one of these does not satisfy the Tour/Divisional requirement for entry in the S
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00229.html (7,593 bytes)

74. Re: Scales at Mid-Div (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:33:03 -0500
So, where do you run then? ;<) the MiDiv. This isn't about cheating. One of the purposes of Divisional and Tour events is to prepare competitors for running Nationals. To that end, the event procedur
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00231.html (10,385 bytes)

75. Re: Scales at Mid-Div (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:02:16 -0500
will be there, the point to >remember is that SCCA is supposed to be a group of individuals who are all pursueing a hobby >that they enjoy. Expecting the rules to be observed by event organizers is i
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00233.html (10,358 bytes)

76. Re: SCCA HQ, more followup to Rocky (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:05:21 -0500
Take a look here: http://www.barbermuseum.org/july_15.htm Could be that George Barber is a factor in the Birmingham deal. Yeah! Why not? We're in the middle of the country (sort of). You'd think this
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00492.html (7,147 bytes)

77. Re: ax-digest V1 #550, HQ move (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 18:20:32 -0500
<snip other stuff with which I agree> Thanks, I think. We'd love to have you here, too. ;<) Jay
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00508.html (6,513 bytes)

78. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:38:44 -0500
metal or year 1992." Correct. calendar year. Incorrect. 1992 is the last model year for which this is allowed, and the year remains the same. Jay
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00534.html (8,601 bytes)

79. Re: Upgraded brake lines....HS legal?? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 12:06:25 -0500
making this Yes. It's not stock. This change occurred during the same rules revision in which engine balancing, .040" overbores, and port matching were disallowed in Stock. Earlier cars were grandfat
/html/autox/2001-05/msg00537.html (9,323 bytes)

80. Re: SM2 Stuff (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 09:35:18 -0500
This controversy is starting up yet again, even as the advocates of the new classes seem to be getting exactly what they've been demanding. I've got a few thoughts to offer that I hope will help to p
/html/autox/2001-04/msg00003.html (10,508 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu