Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:delta-v@kscable.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: I'm part of the 900 (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:23:36 -0500
1. Mac Crossett 3. Wichita, KS 4. #3/#103 ESP Eagle Talon, Thurs/Fri 5. Haven't decided if I'm going to spend the week or not. 6. The parent's house! (That's why I got dad that job in Topeka!) 7. I'l
/html/autox/1999-09/msg00116.html (8,521 bytes)

2. Re: KYB AGX is rebranded GAB Super HP? (score: 1)
Author: "Delta-V" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 21:08:30 -0500
I can say that, for the DSM's, the GAB, KYB, and the stock shocks all use the same shock body. It's my understanding that the GAB is, in fact, build by KYB. I believe that the GAB shocks have a stiff
/html/autox/1999-09/msg01306.html (7,598 bytes)

3. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:30:38 -0500
Well, it's pretty clear that the V-8 owners are trying to protect their turf. After all, ESP (soon to be FSP) is a V-8 pony car class! Now, as long as you've got an uncompetitive car, they'll tell y
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00803.html (9,557 bytes)

4. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:45:43 -0500
It didn't seem to slow John Ames down much, not even with a live axle. Not even that little 4.6L engine. Maybe autox has more to do with driving talent than we think??? Besides, it's not our car's f
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00826.html (10,106 bytes)

5. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 19:20:05 -0500
in Regardless of their intent, the SEB *did* single out one car. It makes me wonder how the topic was brought up for discussion within SEB in the first place. Surely, a board member who had never hea
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01027.html (13,318 bytes)

6. Re: Turbo Update/Backdate - A Solution (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:06:40 -0500
DG posted: Yup, it pretty much solves the problem. It also means a very uncertain status for the rest of this year. with bias, the supposed It's far, far too late for that... Besides irrepairably dam
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01267.html (10,601 bytes)

7. Re: OKC hotels (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:21:29 -0500
After the four-roach motel at Muskogee, we're going upscale. Some of the Wichita people will be staying at the Marriott! (It helps when your wife works for their parent company...employee discount!)
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01331.html (7,012 bytes)

8. Re: SP turbo rules, DG's solution ? (score: 1)
Author: "Mac Crossett" <delta-v@kscable.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:32:01 -0500
KeS sez: Well, you said it better than I did. I can see perfectly valid arguements for restricting turbo backdates to full engine swaps (although I think Dennis' proposal is better, allowing it with
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01416.html (10,678 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu