- 1. RE: re progressive insurance cancellations (score: 1)
- Author: "David Walker" <david.walker@lonemustang.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:58:36 -0700
- I think some more info regarding those two cancellation could be helpful. For all we know, these folks might have filed claims recently for damage suspected to have occurred at an event. I doubt it,
- /html/autox/2002-03/msg00202.html (11,196 bytes)
- 2. RE: Street car - Taurus Question (score: 1)
- Author: "David Walker" <david.walker@lonemustang.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:58:58 -0700
- Same thing happened to my '97 SVT Cobra about four months ago. Car ran fine, but the light came on one day and stayed on steady for about a week. Took it to an autocross, and some time during my fir
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00154.html (8,144 bytes)
- 3. RE: Street car - Taurus Question (score: 1)
- Author: "David Walker" <david.walker@lonemustang.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:09:06 -0700
- Yup. It's like I've always said about Fords: Treat the drivetrain like a baby and the engine like a whore, and it'll last forever. :) /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.
- /html/autox/2002-02/msg00165.html (7,407 bytes)
- 4. RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules (score: 1)
- Author: "David Walker" <david.walker@lonemustang.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 21:25:32 -0700
- I agree in spirit, but there may be a logical explanation for why the rules read the way they do (another newbie weighs in). I've been told that the reason we allow DOT legal "race" tires in stock i
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00170.html (10,403 bytes)
- 5. RE: Stock Shock Rules rewrite? Part 3 (score: 1)
- Author: "David Walker" <david.walker@lonemustang.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:59:32 -0700
- If the same wording applied to shocks, it would be about what we have now, except that adjustable shocks wouldn't be allowed (unless originally so equipped). It may be the only reasonable change the
- /html/autox/2002-01/msg00175.html (7,757 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu