Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:DSeeley1@rochester.rr.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Why is the Supra in SM? Simple... (score: 1)
Author: Dale Seeley <DSeeley1@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 07:47:05 -0500
Hi guys, seat wording was a compromise that wasn't well thought out, and will be modified at a later date. There are Mustangs that came from the factory without a rear seat, they are legal in SP, and
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00073.html (11,046 bytes)

2. Why is the Supra in SM? Simple... (score: 1)
Author: Dale Seeley <DSeeley1@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:22:48 -0500
Those wondering why the Supra is allowed in SM and other, somewhat similar cars like the RX7 and 944 are not, need only look at the results from the first couple National Tours and Pros of 2000. The
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00574.html (8,092 bytes)

3. Daddio address (score: 1)
Author: Dale Seeley <DSeeley1@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 17:51:44 -0400
I'm looking for a valid email address for Mark Daddio, his AOL address seems to be invalid now.... Please help..... Thanks dseeley1@rochester.rr.com
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00112.html (6,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu