- 121. Re: RX7TT - - automatic?? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:06:09 -0800
- All I can say is, wait for a 1994. There are plenty of them out there for short money. The 93's had a myriad of problems with no rhyme or reason to them. I know people who have had zero problems and
- /html/autox/1999-11/msg01256.html (7,002 bytes)
- 122. Re: miata????? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 03:30:58 -0700
- Let me try to shed some light on the situation. Any parties that were involved (SCAC - SEB) who remember it differently or want to add, please do: CS has evolved into an 'affordable' sports car class
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00002.html (10,833 bytes)
- 123. Was miata????? Now C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:33:24 -0700
- Good points. Keep in mind that Chevrolet has jack-squat for contingency. If you really got down to true opinions, I bet you would find a few people who thought a Vette could truly compete. I do think
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00048.html (12,547 bytes)
- 124. Re: BMW muffler question (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 12:37:13 -0700
- I love the Borla products. Aircraft stainless, life-time warranty and GREAT sound from the BMW straight 6. The M3 I drove in 1997 sounded awesome! AB My neighbor has a BMW Z3 2.8 and would like a muf
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00223.html (6,659 bytes)
- 125. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 13:45:23 -0700
- Maybe I'm just a little cranky today... Paul - there are plenty of Vette guys who made waves in SS this year. It may not be the best car, but it is damn competitive. I personally think that the new C
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00336.html (9,052 bytes)
- 126. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 13:59:33 -0700
- Not so. What you will see isn't that the Vette DRIVERS are going away, its that the Vettes have been going away. And there has been a significant resurgence in the last 2 years. AB Really? take a loo
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00339.html (8,215 bytes)
- 127. RE: C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 13:51:43 -0700
- If you don't think that the SCCA/SEB has provided *fair* classes for all cars, then you really haven't thought it out. "Fair" does not mean that every car on this planet can dominate its class. In yo
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00340.html (9,003 bytes)
- 128. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 14:29:19 -0700
- You are not understanding the point. Corvette attendance may have gone down, but the SCCA drivers who ran in Corvettes DID NOT go away. Do you see how adding a Corvette class only dilutes participati
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00347.html (9,362 bytes)
- 129. RE: C4 vs RX-7 TT and Participation Levels (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 09:18:33 -0700
- Thanks for the research guys. So in 1994 there were 44 entrants and 12 trophies. Hmmm. 1999 had 43 entrants and 12 trophies. 23 RX-7's, 19 Corvettes and one Supra. Really sounds broken to me...please
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00431.html (9,532 bytes)
- 130. Re: Crappy Northeast Drivers (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 10:34:11 -0700
- Sorry man, must have missed the specific reference to NYR...I recall 'autoxing the NORTHEAST is poor'. When you make a blanket statement like that, I would hope that your test sample wasn't a small r
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00435.html (8,332 bytes)
- 131. Crappy Northeast Drivers (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 10:09:48 -0700
- Ha, Ha, Ha!!!! Now I know this a computer generated program. "Noclue.exe". Come on Paul, think before you type!!!!! First off, it was Matt Murray who sent the post. Second, he was refering to PCA eve
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00436.html (8,059 bytes)
- 132. C4 Vette number crunching (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:17:49 -0700
- Who cares? I think we are on totally different wavelengths. Why 1989 again? 1994 should be the year analyzed. Maybe even 1995. The data only shows that SS has gotten stronger! 23 cars in 1989? Heck,
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00485.html (7,145 bytes)
- 133. Re: C4 Vette number crunching (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:56:24 -0700
- The "Who cares" was taken out of context. Any person following this thread understands the point. The point is that 1989 isn't a representative year to use as support for your argument. you have stat
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00491.html (7,481 bytes)
- 134. John Thomas fianlly loses... (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 10:46:29 -0700
- ...by 365 days to Shauna Marinus! As was Shauna, John is featured in this weeks Sports Illustrated, "Faces in the Crowd", page 39. "Thomas, 34, a building-products manufacturer, drove his 1986 Honda
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg00882.html (6,639 bytes)
- 135. Pro Solo graphics feedback (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 18:02:20 -0700
- I want to know how everyone felt about the Pro Solo Graphics packages in 1999. I know some had a fundamental problem with haveing 'mandatory' stickers packages but I am really looking for more feedba
- /html/autox/1999-10/msg01537.html (7,339 bytes)
- 136. Re: I'm part of the 900! (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 06:06:06 -0700
- 1. Andy Bettencourt 2. andrew_bettencourt@kingston.com 3. Bridgewater, MA 4. SS / P2, Mazda RX-7 R2, Pro Finale and Tue-Wed 5. Friday Morning to Thursday Morning 6. Plaza Inn 7. Can't wait for the So
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00018.html (8,692 bytes)
- 137. RE: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 09:15:54 -0700
- Holy crap! Somebody who doesn't think GS is broken! Hail the SEB! I've been saying this for a while now, the Type R is a self-fulfilling prophesy. Most of the top drivers migrated to them because the
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00271.html (7,802 bytes)
- 138. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:27:08 -0700
- I'm not saying that the Type R isn't one of the top 2 or 3 cars in the class, because it is <watch out for the Beretta's : )>. As far as killing DS, Nationals should shed a little more light on where
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00285.html (11,380 bytes)
- 139. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:54:18 -0700
- Holy Moly! I guess I hit a nerve. See below: None taken Of course cas aren't classed based on one event. But it is necessary to look very hard at Nationals because 100% of the Nations top drivers are
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00310.html (11,512 bytes)
- 140. Re: The 'New' G Stock? (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:34:07 -0700
- The times quoted are the best RAW times. AB I seem to recall, in the deeper recesses of my mind (where I rarely go), that Endicott *coned* on all runs one of the two days last year.......yes? If so,
- /html/autox/1999-09/msg00329.html (8,831 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu