Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wilwood\s+M\/C\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Wilwood\s+M\/C\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: <ellis838@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:13:00 -0500; Question, is the Wilwood master cylinder with the 3/4 inch bore big enough to replace the stock 7/8 inch unit and not cause any braking problems due to the different bore size. I want to use the Wil; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00165.html (7,204 bytes)
2. Re: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: "jon" <humber_snipe@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:42:02 -0600; Shouldn't be a problem, as replacing the 7/8" unit with a 3/4" one is a common procedure when removing the brake booster - it gives a slightly softer pedal when no booster is used. Jon Arzt Omaha, NE; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00168.html (7,700 bytes)
3. Re: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: "Louis & Laila" <bwana@c2i2.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:09:56 -0700; Are you lucky or what?! I just spent the last week figuring this all out! I had my physics books, and automotive repair books all laid out. I even had help from the physics genius at UCSD! SO, here; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00170.html (12,016 bytes)
4. Re: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: "Greg Locke" <glocke@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:45:04 +1300; Greg an on same, braking 6" absurd of .700" rear rear, pressure about. DECREASES tires, reduce the; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00177.html (13,114 bytes)
5. Re: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: "Barbara Blue" <the_blues@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:07:05 -0500; Lou, I am glad to see that someone has done the legwork (hee hee) on substituting a dual system master cylinder for the original. However, I don't think a person should be diddling with the size of t; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00181.html (14,351 bytes)
6. Re: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: Victor Hughes <v.hughes@student.canberra.edu.au>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:13:52 +1100; Split system were introduced so that in case of fluid loss at least half the system was unaffected and some braking remained. The diagonal system was supposedly better because in case of failure the; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00182.html (14,680 bytes)
7. Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:03:28 -0800; To clear my dual side draft Webers, I went to a .70 Girling master - and that included removing the stock spacer, and fabricating a shorter plunger. It works great. I first did it with a booster - a; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00188.html (7,850 bytes)
8. RE: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: "Tom Hill" <tom.hill@att.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:15:27 -0600; Wilwood make M/C and other brake hardware. You can get information about them at www.wilwood.com. I am planning to use their 3/4 Aluminum M/C with no booster. The dimensions and other info can be fou; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00205.html (8,783 bytes)
9. RE: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:52:09 -0800; I don't have the measurements to the Girling one here at work. I'll check tonight. But, the Wildwood one is shown at 3.91". Pegasus in their catelog shows the Girling MC at 3.95". HOWEVER, that measu; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00238.html (7,403 bytes)
10. RE: Wilwood M/C (score: 1): Author: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:24:32 -0800; Ok, I measured my Girling .70 MC. It's just a bit shorter than the Wildwood one, at 3.875" (3 7/8") , but with a margin of error, it could be the same as the 3.91 Wildwood measurement, 1/32" longer.; /html/alpines/2001-02/msg00264.html (8,019 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]