Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roller\s+rockers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Roller\s+rockers\s*$/: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. Roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Greg Donegan" <tr6greg@fuse.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:51:40 -0400; Just wanted to let those folks know that are affected by this, Jim has contacted me and asked me to let those of you who have his roller rockers installed and have found that your rollers are having; /html/6pack/2005-06/msg00344.html (6,985 bytes)
2. Re: Roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "triumph6970@netzero.com" <triumph6970@netzero.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:37:09 GMT; I find it belated and it's to bad so many are just finding out now.; /html/6pack/2005-06/msg00345.html (6,370 bytes)
3. re:roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Harry Hart" <hhart2404@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:05:28 -0500; has anyone had experience with roller rockers from Good parts? thanks Harry hart; /html/6pack/2005-04/msg00073.html (6,304 bytes)
4. re:roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Timothy Holbrook <tjh173@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:03:43 -0700 (PDT); I have the Goodparts 1.65 rockers. Have had them on the car for several years. Love them, they are great. Beautiful too. My only complaint is that the valve cover hides them from view!! Tim Holbrook; /html/6pack/2005-04/msg00075.html (6,658 bytes)
5. roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Lizirbydavis@cs.com; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:41:46 EST; My first engine rebuild attempt is turning into a potential money pit. The $1500 rebuild I described to my wife is now ....more. I've bought a GP2 cam along with some other go fast goodies. Richard G; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00029.html (8,089 bytes)
6. RE: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Hugh Barber" <tr6nut@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:44:51 -0800; A possible (read: cheaper) alternative would be to get your rocker arms rebuilt. There's a place in Anderson, CA caller Rocker Arm Specialists who will take your assembly (arms and shaft) and rebuild; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00040.html (7,217 bytes)
7. RE: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:06:40 -0500 (EST); The way rocker arm specialists "do" the shaft is that they "turn it" to get it smooth. They then "hard chrome" the shaft to a nominal dimension. They then ream the bushed rockers to that nominal dime; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00048.html (9,337 bytes)
8. Re: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Timothy Holbrook <tjh173@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:57:17 -0800 (PST); I have the GP3 cam with 1.65 rockers on my car. No problems with drivability, and this is a street-driven car. In fact it was my sole mode of transport from May-Dec 1999 and May-August 2000 (while o; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00052.html (9,375 bytes)
9. roller rockers (score: 1): Author: DaCRANEz@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:53:22 EDT; Today I received the roller-rockers that I had ordered about three months ago from Jim Swarthout. I'll admit that I was getting a little nervous as they took some time to arrive and I hadn't been abl; /html/6pack/2004-04/msg00417.html (6,994 bytes)
10. roller rockers (score: 1): Author: DaCRANEz@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:27:25 EDT; The sun came out. The roller rockers gave it a boost from start to 4000. I am refraining from going over 4 grand for the time being. It is idling very rough. I have the timing set at 4 degrees ATDC; /html/6pack/2004-04/msg00418.html (7,005 bytes)
11. RE: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Rick & Lori" <trinitygadget@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:22:29 -0400; Perhaps the rollers are too much for the PI cam. What are your stock & roller valve lifts? Rick O. 72 TR6; /html/6pack/2004-04/msg00419.html (6,593 bytes)
12. RE: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 07:53:32 -0700; You don't say what the ratio is on your roller rockers, or what cam you are running. If the roller rockers are a higher ratio than stock, then some increase in roughness is normal, as the increased; /html/6pack/2004-04/msg00439.html (8,288 bytes)
13. Roller Rockers (score: 1): Author: StuBeatty@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:00:03 EST; A few weeks ago I received my roller rockers from Jim Swarthout. With the engine all apart I was not in a big rush to intstall them. Last weekend I decided to rebuild the rocker shaft. The instructio; /html/6pack/2004-02/msg00200.html (7,495 bytes)
14. Re: Roller Rockers (score: 1): Author: David Friedlander <forzion@maine.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:53:23 -0500; And those of us who have been long awaiting our valve covers are waiting to say the same "oooh-ahhhhh." It has been many moons since we placed our orders.... Dave Friedlander CF25194UO; /html/6pack/2004-02/msg00202.html (7,207 bytes)
15. roller rockers (score: 1): Author: DaCRANEz@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:03:46 EST; I know that J Swarthout has been excommunicated but I am considering installing roller-rockers when I do my engine rebuild. I have not been able to get him to reply to my e-mail. Anybody out there kn; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00229.html (7,274 bytes)
16. Re: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Rob Pennington <robp@ncsa.uiuc.edu>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:20:34 -0600; Check out the performance parts from Ted Schumacher or Richard Good: http://www.tsimportedautomotive.com/ http://www.goodparts.com/parts_roll_rock.html I haven't bought a set from either gentleman (y; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00231.html (7,423 bytes)
17. Re: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:36:18 -0500; I agree. I believe JS's roller rockers are 1.85:1 and as such should only be used with a stock cam. While I'm no expert, from everything I read and hear (Vizard, Kastner, Burgess and others) there's; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00233.html (7,762 bytes)
18. Re: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Peter Macholdt <vze2846b@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:15:44 -0500; Actually, JS's roller rockers are available as 1.75:1, 1.6:1, or 1.5:1. I used the 1.75:1 on a GP2 cam and am VERY happy with the results. FWIW, I added the roller rockers after using the up-rated ca; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00235.html (7,594 bytes)
19. Re: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:16:37 -0500; I did not know JS's roller rocker came in other ratios. That is good to know. Thanks for the correction. I was misinformed. I agree completely. It depends on what you want to do with the engine. I am; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00247.html (9,997 bytes)
20. Re: roller rockers (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:04:00 -0500 (EST); Hey - it was a Nerf(tm) gun! Bob "No Catchy Phrases Today" Lang -- Bob Lang Room N42-140Q | This space for rent Consultant MIT unix-vms-help | Voice:617-253-7438 FAX: 617-258-9535 | --; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00248.html (7,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]