To: | "'Randall'" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>, <Triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TR] water wetter |
From: | "Wayne Lee" <wayne@motorcarriage.com> |
Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:33:21 -0500 |
The temperature will still be regulated by the Thermostat. Water Wetter or not. It will just be a little more capable of reducing the temp if given access to the radiator. -----Original Message----- From: triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Randall Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:23 PM To: Triumphs@autox.team.net Subject: Re: [TR] water wetter > So maybe there is a benefit that just doesn't show up in the gauge > reading. I guess that depends on whether lowering cylinder temperatures is a Good Thing. From what I have read, internal combustion engines are actually more efficient running at higher temperatures (part of the reason that 'smog' engines use 195F thermostats) and that we only accept 180F as "normal" because the coolant is primarily water. -- Randall triumphs@autox.team.net ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 9.0.0.888, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18790) http://www.pctools.com/ ======= triumphs@autox.team.net Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TR] water wetter, Randall |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TR] water wetter, Wayne Lee |
Previous by Thread: | [TR] water wetter, Randall |
Next by Thread: | [TR] water wetter, Wayne Lee |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |