To: | TR <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Build Year or Sale/Title Year? |
From: | Geo Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com> |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:53 -0700 |
References: | <6451DA0C.090E7C3D.0DA3C552@aol.com> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
ZoboHerald@aol.com wrote: >...Twenty years ago, such a situation could be an "issue" for someone trying >to apply for "Historical" license plates and/or insurance -- in having to >establish that the car was, say, 25 years old. Now, it's not an issue... > Except in cases where states allow "year-of-manufacture" plates to be used. In some states (e.g. AZ) not all years had plates produced and some years colors look better with the car. When I got the TR4 it was registered as a '65 even though it was built mid-64. Had it retitled as a 64 for the YOM plate preference Geo Hahn 59 TR3A 64 TR4 My Lemmon, AZ. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Build Year or Sale/Title Year?, Tim I. Purdy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Build Year or Sale/Title Year?, Kinderlehrer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Build Year or Sale/Title Year?, Tim I. Purdy |
Next by Thread: | Re: Build Year or Sale/Title Year?, Kinderlehrer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |