Message text written by "Fred Thomas"
>> I was mildly amused at the metric conversion info / jokes going around.
.
> .but then to have that entire 809 message tacked on to the end of a
reply.
.
> . .
>
> Talk about a waste of bandwidth!
Did I make a mistake, I'm not so sure, would I do it again, "YES", tomorrow
if it saved just one lister $1.00 <SNIP>
<
No, Fred. You did nothing wrong. Tinker is not talking about you. He is
referring to the person who responded to your post and included your
<ENTIRE> post when only the first four or five lines would have sufficed.
I agree with Tinker. I didn't even have to page down to see that the rest
of the original message was even there to know what it was about. (Notice
that I edited you response? That's because folks reading this will
remember what you said and I only need to include enough to remind them
WHICH post I am responding to.)
Dave (Keep it brief) Massey
///
/// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|