To: | George Richardson <gprtech@frontiernet.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Why triumph won't be back. |
From: | David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:11:19 -0500 |
Cc: | "Paul J. Burr" <tigerpb@ids.net>, "[unknown]" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, Gary Nafziger <naffy@netins.net>, "Michael D. Porter" <mporter@zianet.com> |
Message text written by George Richardson >Now I see both, all day long. Besides that, the government is going to start taxing SUVs as passenger vehicles rather than trucks. Once they do that, the prices will rise and people will loose interest. Remember the minivan? Once it seemed everyone owned one. Now they're a lot less common, replaced by SUVs. < A more important consideration is will the SUV's be counted as cars in the CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) calculation? That would REALLY effect the offering on the market. Dave |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | smart owner LONG, David Massey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | TR7 BFH#35 - Valve adjustment, Eganb |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Why triumph won't be back., George Richardson |
Next by Thread: | RE: Why triumph won't be back., Bowen, Patrick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |