triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RotoFlex Suspension

To: Phil Ethier <pethier@isd.net>
Subject: Re: RotoFlex Suspension
From: Randall Young <randallyoung@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:26:17 -0800
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <031101c059c9$66055d20$df8ceed0@PhilEthier>
Phil Ethier wrote:
> 
> From: naldous@ccgmail.com <naldous@ccgmail.com>
> 
> >I would think that a lot of torque and horsepower would be lost through the
> >rubber rotoflex.
> 
> Lost where?  I mean, where would it go?

What little is lost, is lost in stretching the rubber, which always
takes a little more energy than what it 'gives back' when it returns to
it's original shape.  The loss goes to heat, heating the rubber.  As I
said before, it sure isn't much, or the rubber would melt.  

> And do you think that Lotus would stand for that?

I'm sure Lotus understands the engineering tradeoffs as well as anyone,
but I've never heard that they were 'into' ultra-low-loss drivetrains. 
I thought they concentrated more on handling, which is why you very
rarely see a Lotus at the drag strip <g>

Randall

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>