To: | Gernot Vonhoegen <gernot.vonhoegen@stir.ac.uk> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Still more electric fans |
From: | "\"Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" <passaretti@sol.med.ge.com> |
Date: | Mon, 30 Mar 1998 13:11:03 -0600 |
Cc: | triumphs@Autox.Team.Net |
References: | <ED6996BA8DFED011806C0020AF0C71FA0A9835@inchna.stir.ac.uk> |
>>>>> "Gernot" == Gernot Vonhoegen <gernot.vonhoegen@stir.ac.uk> writes: Gernot> What speaks against unbolting the fan, refitting the bolts, Gernot> checking they are not fouling now there is less thickness Gernot> and doing it that way? Not that I would be too familiar Gernot> with the TR4, but... As I understand it, the "nose" that the fan sits on is necessary for stabilizing the crank. It's a heavy sucker, that's for sure. I'm told by several E-Mails that the blades themselves can be removed, but the nose must stay, or be replaced with a harmonic dampener of some sort. -MM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Thermostatic switchs for Elecrtic Fans, Steve Chandler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Starter solved but now no start on 80 Spitfire, Nikki MW1 |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Still more electric fans, Gernot Vonhoegen |
Next by Thread: | RE: Still more electric fans, Gernot Vonhoegen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |