To: | James Charles Ruwaldt <jruwaldt@indiana.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia) |
From: | George Richardson <gprtech@ix.netcom.com> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 1997 14:11:02 -0500 |
Cc: | triumphs@Autox.Team.Net |
Organization: | Merlin Group Inc. |
References: | <Pine.HPP.3.96.971030111901.19275B-100000@falstaff.ucs.indiana.edu> |
James Charles Ruwaldt wrote: > > I understand all that, but why do we call them "alternators", when they > produce direct current? Actually, they produce AC, which is then converted to DC by the internal rectifiers. -- George Richardson '57 TR3, TS15559L (getting ready to paint - and now on the web!) http://www.merlingroupinc.com/tr3.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: 64 lb. engine - non-lbc, Chris Lillja |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Martin_A._Secrest |
Previous by Thread: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Joe Worsley |
Next by Thread: | Re: AC/DC (was Pertronix perplexia), Martin_A._Secrest |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |