Thanks, I'll give that a try too. I have until the end of next month to
get this figured out. I will have to leave it in the garage today &
tomorrow if it snows, maybe on Wed, I can work on it. Jane
>Jane Burdekin wrote:
>>
>did you pass the CO part of the test? the other reason it passed at
>2500 is because that is only a recomendation and not actually part of
>the test. they don't care what your car does at 2500, they only care at
>idle....
> suggestoins are to richen the carbs up a tad bid....this might raise
>the CO reading a little bit...but it will lower the hydrocarbons...also
>play with the timing....advance it until it doesn't run very well.
>
>aaron
>fort collins, co
>
>> Well folks, the GT6 failed emmissions again here in Colorado. What would
>> make it passable (under 1000 hydrocarbons) at 2500 rpms, and fail at idle
>> (923ish rpms)? I changed the spark plugs, and oil, added a quart of marvel
>> mystery oil, and blew out the air filters. I would have had new air
>> filters but the parts place is having operator error problems. If anyone
>> has any suggestions let me know. Thanks, Jane
|