To: | Kris Kane <motrsprt@micron.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Spit HP (was emissions) |
From: | "Johnny Storm:- International Racing car driver" <hiu06f@bangor.ac.uk> |
Date: | Wed, 8 Oct 1997 11:08:56 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) |
Cc: | "'Tom O'Malley'" <tomomalley@hey.net>, "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net> |
On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Kris Kane wrote: > Okay, for those of us who have taken our 1500 engines and rebuilt them > with 9.0:1 compression pistons, new valves,etc what can we expect? 65, perhaps 70 hp.? Gees, I > was hoping for at least 80. That, of course, was based on my initial > point of what I thought was 68 hp. Oh heck everyone knows that if you give loads of money to Triumph-Tune you can get 115 bhp from the 1500, Ha ha ha ha (oh, i've fallen from my chair!). Johnny (Who's since seen 2.1 crossflows for the price of a good recon 1500) '77 Ford?Spitfire 2100 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: MOT Requirements<343B047E.B84D755@bellsouth.net>, RICHARD.JACKSON |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Triumphest and "Dress Code", Johnny Storm:- International Racing car driver |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Spit HP (was emissions), Tom O'Malley |
Next by Thread: | RE: Spit HP (was emissions), Atwell (Buff) Haines |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |