triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

re: emissions<3434e78f.15193846@mail.hey.net>

To: tomomalley@hey.net
Subject: re: emissions<3434e78f.15193846@mail.hey.net>
From: RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 09:12:39 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net, RICHARD.JACKSON@NENE.AC.UK
>Richard "Marathon Man" Jackson writes:

>>Right! Off goes my cylinder head to have 2 inches skimmed of it, should give
>>me LOADS of power!!!!!!! :-)

>Ah....but you'll need to use "20 Star" petrol...quite scarce even in
>the UK, and you'll likely sustain a performance penalty given it's
>weight...it's solid lead. :-)

Hmmmm, may have to fit slightly larger jets, me thinks!!!!!! :-)

>>> For reasons unknown to me, the 1976 Federal Spec Spitfire came through
>>> with compression *increased* to 9.0 to 1...up from the 7.5 to 1 used
>>> the three years before and in all later years.
>>
>>> Comparing that car's performance to the dual S.U. UK version should
>>> give you your answer.

>>What was the official performance of this year Spit, Just curious????
>>Cheerio
>>Rich

>Ha!  I was hoping *you'd* know.  Here in the U.S., auto magazines
>weren't exactly fighting with themselves over the chance to test the
>latest Spitfire.  If there's a published report on this model year
>that anyone knows of I'll try to track it down.

Cheers,

>Meanwhile, we can probably get some idea by looking at the specs.
>Your 1500's with dual S.Us and 9.0 to 1 compression are rated at
>71BHP.
>Our 1500's <ex '76> with single strombergs and 7.5 to 1 compression
>are rated at 57 BHP. <sniff>

Oh, so YOU got the Diesel version eh!!!! :-)

57Bhp, that's less than my 73 MkIV 1300, either 61, 63 or 67Bhp, depending on
which roadtest you read.  NOW THAT IS GUTLESS!!!!!!! :-) 

>If we take our 57BHP models and add 4.5 % increased power for the 9.0
>to 1 '76 model we get about 60BHP...seems reasonable.  Maybe a '76
>owner on the list can confirm or deny this.

Hmmmmmmmm, them tyres are starting to smoke at the mere thought of all that
POWER :-)

>Performance wise, we also need to look at the weight difference.
>You've no doubt noticed that the front and rear bumpers on our cars
>look a bit different than yours. :-)  There's a lotta re-enforced
>steel behind these babys and it doesn't look real lightweight.

I thought they were helicopter landing pads or something!!! :-)

>Between that and the weight from the added smog equipotent and larger
>radiator I could believe it's over 125 lbs difference.

Well, my gut adds the extra 125lb to UK Spits!!!! ;-)

>BTW....to the best of my knowledge, all squaretail Spits had guard
>beams welded inside the doors for safety.  Was this also true of your
>cars?

Nope, we had to die a slow painful lingering death in the event of a side
impact!!! :-)

We never had the additional outriggers under the boot floor either, although
wasn't this only on the later US cars also? 

>Cheers!
>Tom O'Malley <singing in the rain without his rubbers>

No doing any running either I hope!!! :-)

Cheerio

Rich
Northampton
England 'That god foresaken place that built these damned things, and
birthplace of Lucifer lucas, Prince of Darkness'.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • re: emissions<3434e78f.15193846@mail.hey.net>, RICHARD.JACKSON <=