triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spitfire coil questions4

To: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
Subject: Re: Spitfire coil questions4
From: Zink <zink@pdq.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 23:35:00 -0500
Cc: Sean Johnson <sean_johnson@milacron.com>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
References: <Pine.PCW.3.94.970612124605.9831H-100000@Andrew-Mace>
Andrew Mace wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Sean Johnson wrote:
> 
> > ...If getting a "hotter" spark is that much better, why
> > didn't it come from the factory that way?
> 
> Bean counters! :-) The hotter coils cost more, sometimes a lot more,
> than
> a "stock" coil.
> 
> --Andy
> 
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * Andrew Mace, President and                *
> *   10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Consultant *
> * Vintage Triumph Register                  *
> * amace@unix2.nysed.gov                     *
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I will agree with Andy, plus add, They didn't want to make the cars to
"hot" for the street and make insurance rates sky rocket.
Larry Zink
1964 Spitfire4(almost stock)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>