| To: | Rande Bellman <rande@thecia.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 260 vs 289 |
| From: | Régent Gagnon <regentgagnon@rogers.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Aug 2004 07:27:29 -0400 |
AMEN Regent Gagnon B382100371 (Orchid Green) Ottawa, Canada On Aug 20, 2004, at 6:39, Rande Bellman wrote: > The rap about why Shelby gave Rootes ill-prepared 260's to use instead > of the 289's he used for his own cars could be nailed down by Shelby > if someone had the talent to ask him in a non-accusatory way. The > urban myth is that it was to intentionally give Rootes a disadvantage. > I'd love to hear Shelbys side. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 260 vs 289, Rande Bellman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Tiger brakes...what about rotors and booster..., Paul R. Breuhan |
| Previous by Thread: | 260 vs 289, Rande Bellman |
| Next by Thread: | RE: 260 vs 289, Ron Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |