To: | tigers@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Vin tags; the actual law; reply to Bob diehl's question |
From: | VegasLegal@aol.com |
Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:18:52 -0400 |
Dear Bob: That's not your problem. The analysis is backwards. The question is, "how would the state prove that the car underneath is a different car." If it were a stolen car, information re: The theft (i.e., The car had a scratch on the bumper shaped like the last 100 miles of the Mississippi) would surface. If it were always your car, there is nothing to counter your contention that it is your car. Both the DMV and the State in a prosecution would have to prove you're lying, you don't have to prove you're telling the truth. Bob Nersesian |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Shifter Ring; reply to Pete., Theo Smit |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Vin tags; the actual law; reply to Bob diehl's question, Bob Diehl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Vin tags; the actual law, VegasLegal |
Next by Thread: | Re: Vin tags; the actual law; reply to Bob diehl's question, Bob Diehl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |