tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: Air Cleaner Question

To: tigers@autox.team.net, tigerpb@ids.net (Paul Burr)
Subject: Re[2]: Air Cleaner Question
From: LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 96 16:13:56 PST
     
     All;
     
          -Speaking of carbs, wasn't it also Ross Perot that said: "THAT
           GREAT BIG SUCKING SOUND YOU HEAR....."?
     
     
                           Phil


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Air Cleaner Question
Author:  tigerpb@ids.net (Paul Burr) at ~INTERNET
Date:    4/17/96 4:10 PM


>Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 18:13:43 -0400 
>To:NamasteRH@aol.com
>From:tigerpb@ids.net (Paul Burr)
>Subject:Re: Air Cleaner Question
>
>
>>
>>Also, is anyone actually running on the original carb/manifold setup? 
>> EVERYONE on the list seems to talk about mods, so I am left wondering
>>whether my efforts toward originality are a waste of time.  If you ARE using 
>>the original setup, how is it?  Just "OK" or "perfectly satisfactory"?
>> Inquiring minds want to know.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Rick Hoefle (1964 Tiger B9470508)
>
>Rick; I'm still running the original 2bl and manifold and air cleaner. 
>And yes, it will be replaced with a 4bl.  The reason is that the original 
>30 year old carb has worn out-litteraly.  The carb body, where the 
>throttle plate shaft passes through, has worn itself oval.  This causes a 
>vacum leak that makes accurately setting the idle mixture impossible.  A 
>rebuilt 2bl is $200 nowadays! Heck, I used to get 'em for $25!( ok, so it 
>was 10 years ago) Any how, someone gave me a 600cfm Holley 4bl, and I 
>figure that a good manifold is @ $125.  As Ross Perot says "DO THE 
>MATH..." The car already has aftermarket headers, so the 4bl should wake 
>the car up nicely.
>Functionaly the 2bl works good, but I'd really like the oomph that a 4bl adds. 
>
     
     


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>