spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: re-torque cyl heads

To: "Mike" <mikee@ragtops.com>, fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: re-torque cyl heads
From: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:57:36 -0500
Delivered-to: mharc@demo.fatchancegarage.com
In-reply-to: <4254FC96.17520.A8544829@localhost>
References: <200504070408.j3748Wwp020735@autox.team.net> <4254FC96.17520.A8544829@localhost>
Reply-to: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Sender: owner-fot@autox.team.net
How come new engines don't need to be re-torqued? I've
never heard of taking a car back for it's 1000 mile re-torque. Maybe
they did this years ago, pre-war?, but I don't know.

I always re-torque too.

It's common practice in the engine manufacturing business to tighten all torques at once using very expensive multi-spindle machines. At least one of these manufacturers has its machine programmed to torque the bolts to different torques determined through extensive studies, and some nuts get torqued, loosened, and retorqued, to take care of gasket relaxation and results from reliability testing.

This torque-reverse-retorque is quite common in assembling very tightly toleranced parts like hydraulic valves, hydrostatic steerings and such, especially those made from aluminum parts.


uncle jack
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>