Don't know about the seller, but the car definitely ain't concours!!
Bob
>Dear concerned,
> Charley and Peggy are correct. It is "concourse condition" [sic] that the
>seller was trying to convey in his text. I personally know the seller and
>the car. Both are concours in my humble opinion.
>
>Dave@Taos Garage Annex in Albuquerque
>59 AH :{) 54 BN1
>
>Click below for webpage and mopeds:
>http://ibelong.koz.com/ibn/ignore?MIval=cge&GID=01039011420945892954943146
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brad Fornal" <toyman@digitex.net>
>To: "Charley & Peggy Robinson" <ccrobins@ktc.com>
>Cc: <Ajhsys@aol.com>; <Bushwacker4@prodigy.net>; <Spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:57 AM
>Subject: Re: "Concours" Restoration
>
>
>> That is why we are all here Charlie, to learn from each other!! I made
>the
>> mistake of making my first question to the list the Morris vs. B.L.
thread
>> (check the archives if you want on that one). Man, did I see a bit of a
>> conversation on that score <G>. Anyway, you should never hesitate to ask
a
>> question, because more often than not, someone else will learn from the
>> answers that you receive. Brad
>>
>> Charley & Peggy Robinson wrote:
>>
>> > Shux, I didn't read the text, just looked at the pic. So I went back
>> > and looked again. The guy said "restored to concours _condition_", not
>> > that it was a concours example. Seems fair enuff to me, if you read
it
>> > carefully. Don't know if the seller was trying to mislead or not,
can't
>> > get into his head.
>> >
>> > Guess I shouldn't have asked since I don't know jack about Sprites.
>> > Er, well I guess that's why I _did ask_.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > CR
>>
>>
|