spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: GTO

To: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>, Christopher Palmer <ctp@gbn.org>
Subject: RE: GTO
From: Peter C <nosimport@mailbag.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 15:32:36 -0800
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9901151257190.14586-100000@saul1.u.washington.edu>
References: <v04003a15b2c554787dbc@[199.97.207.138]>
Reply-to: Peter C <nosimport@mailbag.com>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
Makes you wonder what X1/1 through /8 were like.
Peter mgCgt
------->
At 12:59 PM 1/15/99 -0800, Ulix Goettsch wrote:
>A good one :-)
>Hey guys, I think the name is stupid too.
>They called the super boring sedan the "Mirafiori", 
>then they design the best handling sportscar in the world and they call it
>some math problem...
>
>UliX1/9
>
>
>On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Christopher Palmer wrote:
>
>> X1/9 always sounded like a bathroom cleaner to me...a manly one though!
>> 
>> Sorry Ulix ;)
>> 
>> CTP
>> 
>> At 1:47 PM -0800 1/15/99, Peter C wrote:
>> >As in Innocenti?............ I give      you win
>> >Ciao    Peter C (not S ...for a variety of reasons)
>> >remember the bad joke which punchline was".. look at that S car go!"?
>> >
>> >At 11:16 AM 1/15/99 -0800, Ulix Goettsch wrote:
>> >>More imaginative than calling a car an "S"...  :-)
>> >>Ulix
>> >>
>> >>On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Peter C wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> And I suppose X1/9 is manly?    ;-)
>> >>> Peter C
>> >>>  so why would they give it a "sissy" italian name?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >    Ulix                                       __/__,__
___/__|\__
>> >>>
>..............................................(_o____o_)....<_O_____O_/...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>