spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Electronic Ignition

To: "'Jeff Boatright'" <jboatri@emory.edu>, "'spridgets@autox.team.net'" <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: Electronic Ignition
From: Jeff Zurschmeide <zurschmeidej@interactivenw.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 14:15:33 -0800
Reply-to: Jeff Zurschmeide <zurschmeidej@interactivenw.com>
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net

>-----Original Message-----
>From:  Jeff Boatright [SMTP:jboatri@emory.edu]
>Sent:  Wednesday, October 28, 1998 2:05 PM
>To:    Jeff Zurschmeide; spridgets@autox.team.net
>Subject:       RE: Electronic Ignition
>
>Jeff Zurschmeide,
>
>I bow to your expertise, though I of course wouldn't know about points
>bounce above 6500 rpm as I don't run that high (yet!).
>[]  Awwwww.....gosh. Don't bow too far. I just do what I have found
>works best on my car. Best is a rubbery value that combines ease
>of maintenance with reasonable performance. Ease of maintenance
>tends to win out with me over absolute best performance. 
>
>So, indexing is to set the plug gap into the _middle_ of the combustion
>chamber. That makes more sense than what I read (on another list) on the
>web. I'll buy that that _could_ give a little better burn.
>[]  Looking at the angle of the plug in the chamber, you want the open 
>part of the plug to face down into the cylinder. At least, that's how 
>the previous owner 'splained it to me. I had a few sets of indexed 
>plugs. Didn't notice any difference when I changed to standard
>plugs threaded at random. 
>
>Thanks for the education,
>[]  Well, YMMV. 
>
>JZ
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>