spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DOT 5

To: <spitfires@autox.team.net>, <Peter.Bona@vodafone.com>
Subject: Re: DOT 5
From: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:20:53 -0500
DOT 5.1 is *NOT* silicone, it is *NOT* DOT 5.

It's extremely poor wording choice on the part of DOT.  It would have
been better numbered DOT6.  It's the next generation of the glycol based
fluids.  DOT 3 - 4 - 5.1

Castrol SRF is DOT 4 glycol.
ATE is a brand name, they market a variety of fluids, DOT 4 being their
most common.
Lucas is a brand name, they market a variety of fluids, DOT 4 being
their most common.

DOT5 is always a silicone based fluid.  You must look for, and find on
the container, the DOT number, and select only a fluid that says DOT5
and DOT5 only.


>>> "Bsna, Piter, VF-Hungary" <Peter.Bona@vodafone.com> 02/11/03
08:36AM >>>
I want to drain my brake system and would like to upgrade to DOT 5 for
the reasons well known for us. I have  found different products, as
LUCAS, Castrol SRS, Valvolin 5.1, ATE, but when I asked the suppliers
whether these brake fluids are silicon based or not, they were not
sure
about it. So my question is: Is DOT 5 a guarantee for silicon brake
fluid or it could be anything else (paint eater) as well?

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>