shop-talk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: digital cameras

To: mdunst@smtplink.coh.org, shop-talk@Autox.Team.Net, copper@headgasket.com,
Subject: Re: digital cameras
From: John Miller <johnm@ims.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Mike Rambour <mikey@inline-tech.com> writes:

> >     Any experience with digital Cameras? Basically, looking for simple yet 
> 
>   The only experience I have is the Kodak 120 and 210. I have borrowed the
> 120 from a friend many times and been impressed with it, its a 2 year old
> model I don't know if they made changes since then on that model.  The 210
> is supposed to be higher resolution, meaning higher quality pictures, but
> the zoom on it is AWFUL.  Its not a 2X zoom, its a 1X to 2X lens with no in
> between.  You either get your picture large or small.  The 120 has a 3X
> zoom and its what I call a true zoom, you can stop when you have framed the
> car part correctly and shoot.  And personally I can't tell a difference in
> the picture quality.  I have only borrowed the 210 once and I can't count
> the number of times I have borrowed the 120.
> 
>   Santa has been made very well aware that she had better have a 120 in her
> bag for me.

I beg to differ on the DC210  I own one and it is a full 1X to 2X zoom.
Zoom in/out till you get the picture you want (1X, 1.5X, 1.733X, 2X, whatever).
Works as I would want it to.  The thing I want is a much greater zoom range.
8X would be great!

While I'm on the subject, I always use full resolution and at that the 4MB
flashcard only holds about 13 pictures. Plan on buying a 16MB card or so.
It also eats batteries. I guess those mini LCD's draw some serious power.


John Miller


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>